首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同品种桑椹中糖酸组成和甜酸风味评价
引用本文:乔宇,吕辉华,吴继军,廖李,陈学玲,王俊,汪兰,吴文锦,丁安子,程薇.不同品种桑椹中糖酸组成和甜酸风味评价[J].北京工商大学学报(自然科学版),2016,34(4):44-49.
作者姓名:乔宇  吕辉华  吴继军  廖李  陈学玲  王俊  汪兰  吴文锦  丁安子  程薇
作者单位:湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064,湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064,广东省农业科学院 蚕业与农产品加工研究所, 广东 广州 510610,湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064,湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064,湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064,湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064,湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064,湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064,湖北省农业科学院 农产品加工与核农技术研究所/湖北省农业科技创新中心 农产品加工分中心, 湖北 武汉 430064
基金项目:农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303073)。
摘    要:比较不同品种桑椹中的糖酸组成,并对其进行甜酸风味评价。以19 个桑椹品种的果实为试材,采用高效液相色谱法分析不同品种有机酸及糖的种类和含量,在此基础上比较各品种间的果实酸甜风味。结果表明,所有桑椹品种含有柠檬酸、酒石酸、苹果酸、琥珀酸、草酸和富马酸,部分桑椹品种含有乳酸和乙酸,含量较高的4种有机酸为柠檬酸、酒石酸、琥珀酸,苹果酸,总有机酸质量比在1687.9~2972.1mg/kg。最高的是云果1号,最低的是安杂8号。果糖和葡萄糖是桑椹的主要糖类,同一品种二者含量相当,品种之间存在差异。与糖酸比相比,采用甜度和酸度的比值构建的甜酸风味指数更能真实地反映果实的甜酸风味。从甜酸风味指数角度来考虑,以白玉王和太深1号2个品种较佳。

关 键 词:桑椹    有机酸    
收稿时间:2015/6/19 0:00:00

Analysis of Organic Acids and Sugar Compositions and Flavor Evaluation of Different Mulberry Cultivars
QIAO Yu,LYU Huihu,WU Jijun,LIAO Li,CHEN Xueling,WANG Jun,WANG Lan,WU Wenjin,DING Anzi and CHENG Wei.Analysis of Organic Acids and Sugar Compositions and Flavor Evaluation of Different Mulberry Cultivars[J].Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University:Natural Science Edition,2016,34(4):44-49.
Authors:QIAO Yu  LYU Huihu  WU Jijun  LIAO Li  CHEN Xueling  WANG Jun  WANG Lan  WU Wenjin  DING Anzi and CHENG Wei
Institution:Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China,Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China,Sericulture and Agri-Food Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510610, China,Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China,Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China,Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China,Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China,Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China,Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China and Research Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear-Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Agricultural Products Processing Subcenter, Hubei Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center, Wuhan 430064, China
Abstract:The objective of the study was to compare the composition of organic acid and sugar of different mulberry cultivars and to evaluate the sweetness and acidity. The organic acid and sugar compositions of fruits from different 19 mulberry cultivars were analyzed by the HPLC method. The results showed that all cultivars contained citric acid, pyruvic acid, malic acid, succinic acid, oxalic acid, and fumaric acid, while several cultivars had lactic acid and acetic acid.The contents of organic acids ranged from 1687.9-2972.1mg/kg and Yunguo 1 cultivar and Anza 8 cultivar had the highest and lowest organic acids contents. Both fructose and glucose were soluble sugars in the mulberry. The contents of fructose and glucose of the same cultivars almost were equal. The fruit flavor index established by the ratio of sweetness and acidity could better reflect the real flavor of fruits than the sugar-acid ratio. Considering the flavor index of sweetness and acidity, the optimal cultivars were Baiyuwang and Taishen 1.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《北京工商大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京工商大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号