用均匀设计法优化瓜尔豆愈伤组织诱导的研究

以瓜尔豆子叶和下胚轴为外植体，采用均匀设计法，研究了基本培养基、激素水平、蔗糖浓度和活性炭对愈伤组织形成的影响。通过建立模型表明，瓜尔豆子叶形成愈伤组织的能力高于下胚轴；2，4-D和蔗糖浓度在一定范围内对愈伤组织的形成呈正相关性作用，且外植体、2，4-D和KT浓度三者之间存在很强的交互作用；而活性炭对愈伤组织形成未表现出明显作用。     

1Cr18Ni9Ti不锈钢的双频电磁约束成形工艺参数优化

根据高频磁场利于感应加热、低频磁场利于熔体成形的特点，针对不锈钢(1Cr18Ni9Ti)密度大、熔点高和约束成形的熔体高度低等成形困难的特点，提出了利用低频磁场约束成形、高频磁场在不影响成形磁场的条件下辅助加热的不锈钢双频电磁约束成形方法，以便温度场和成形力场的最佳耦合．通过实验和理论分析，设计了不锈钢双频电磁约束成形的成形感应器和预热感应器，并确定了感应器间的距离和屏蔽罩的放置方式，研究了预热感应器对温度场的影响规律，从而建立了不锈钢的双频电磁约束成形系统．在对熔体的稳定成形分析的基础上，利用双频电磁成形系统成功抽拉出圆形不锈钢样件．     

异步电机矢量控制系统动态仿真方法

介绍了应用高级语言结合图形化工具仿真动态研究异步电机矢量控制系统的方法.异步电机模型、采用矢量控制策略的变频器模型和通用机械负载模型在Simulink中建立并组合为完整的变频调速系统仿真模型.模型被转化嵌入到C 的主程序而得到可以进行全面、动态、可视化仿真的异步电机变频调速系统软件.测试结果表明该方法得到的仿真模型正确,软件功能多样,使用方便.     

香根草愈伤组织的诱导和快速繁殖

为了寻找大批量快速繁殖香根草的有效办法,以香根草的茎段、茎节为实验材料进行愈伤组织的诱导和快速繁殖的实验.用不同浓度的6-BA、IAA、2,4-D对其不同的外植体进行试验.结果表明:在愈伤组织诱导实验中,MS培养基附加6-BA 0.5mg/L 2,4-D 2.0mg/L的激素组合对茎段愈伤组织诱导效果最佳;将产生的愈伤组织团转入分化培养基中,诱导不定芽,其最适分化培养基为MS附加6-BA 3.5mg/L IAA 0.2mg/L;再生苗在MS培养基附加6-BA 3.0mg/L IAA 0.5mg/L的培养基上,进行生根培养效果较好.可见,茎段和茎节均可作为外植体.考虑到茎段数量较大,易取材,且效果明显优于茎节,认为茎段是香根草组培快繁的理想外植体.     

异步发电机空载建压电容值的确定方法

为使异步发电机建立数值给定的空载电压,采用了通过优化求取建压电容的新方法。以异步发电机基值频率所对应的等值电路为基础,令等值电路回路阻抗的实部与虚部分别为零作为异步发电机稳态运行的条件,并由此计算异步空载建压电容值。用Hooke-Jeeves提出的模式搜索法来求解有约束优化问题,从而克服了传统的Newton-Raphson法稳定性差与难于处理有约束条件之弱点。论文给出了空载时建立不同数值端电压所需的电容值,计算结果与实验结果的相互吻合说明了分析方法的正确性。计算结果同时验证了饱和程度对空载建压电容值的影响,表明随着饱和程度的增加,空载建压电容值的增加幅度越来越大。     

异步电机起动运行的分析与计算

在分析d—q原型电机的基础上，利用对称分量法和电机矩阵，得出了异步电机在对称分量轴系下的数学模型，并应用此模型对异步电机在对称的额定电压下与不对称电压下的起动过程进行比较分析．利用Madab语言编写了异步电动机的起动计算机程序，并给出了具体算例．     

动生电动势公式的普适推导

应用法拉第电磁感应定律,直接导出了动生电动势公式,并对动生电动势与洛仑兹力学的关系进行了讨论.     

无镀镍铜铝低温钎焊工艺研究

运用感应加热工艺,开发了低成本且工艺简单的无镀镍铜铝复合材料的低温分层钎焊法。试验了4种铝用钎料及其钎焊工艺代替电镀镍作为铝表面镀层,解决了铜板与铝板之间的焊接问题。观察了焊接区域的界面形貌、断后形貌,测量了焊接件的剪切强度。结果表明,高低温钎料分层钎焊工艺可以实现铜铝板的有效连接,所获得的铜铝焊接件剪切强度最高可达26 MPa,焊接区域无明显的焊接缺陷;刮擦钎焊既可以搭配高温钎料,也可以搭配低温钎料使用,并且焊接件的剪切强度能达到行业要求。     

Studies on induction hardening of powder-metallurgy-processed Fe-Cr/Mo alloys

Induction hardening of dense Fe-Cr/Mo alloys processed via the powder-metallurgy route was studied. The Fe-3Cr-0.5Mo, Fe-1.5Cr-0.2Mo, and Fe-0.85Mo pre-alloyed powders were mixed with 0.4wt%, 0.6wt%, and 0.8wt% C and compacted at 500, 600, and 700 MPa, respectively. The compacts were sintered at 1473 K for 1 h and then cooled at 6 K/min. Ferrite with pearlite was mostly observed in the sintered alloys with 0.4wt% C, whereas a carbide network was also present in the alloys with 0.8wt% C. Graphite at prior particle boundaries led to deterioration of the mechanical properties of alloys with 0.8wt% C, whereas no significant induction hardening was achieved in alloys with 0.4wt% C. Among the investigated samples, alloys with 0.6wt% C exhibited the highest strength and ductility and were found to be suitable for induction hardening. The hardening was carried out at a frequency of 2.0 kHz for 2-3 s. A case depth of 2.5 mm was achieved while maintaining the bulk (interior) hardness of approximately HV 230. A martensitic structure was observed on the outer periphery of the samples. The hardness varied from HV 600 to HV 375 from the sample surface to the interior of the case hardened region. The best combination of properties and hardening depth was achieved in case of the Fe-1.5Cr-0.2Mo alloy with 0.6wt% C.     

Extensional scientific realism vs. intensional scientific realism

Extensional scientific realism is the view that each believable scientific theory is supported by the unique first-order evidence for it and that if we want to believe that it is true, we should rely on its unique first-order evidence. In contrast, intensional scientific realism is the view that all believable scientific theories have a common feature and that we should rely on it to determine whether a theory is believable or not. Fitzpatrick argues that extensional realism is immune, while intensional realism is not, to the pessimistic induction. I reply that if extensional realism overcomes the pessimistic induction at all, that is because it implicitly relies on the theoretical resource of intensional realism. I also argue that extensional realism, by nature, cannot embed a criterion for distinguishing between believable and unbelievable theories.