The role of transmembrane domains in membrane fusion

Biological membrane fusion is driven by different types of molecular fusion machines. Most of these proteins are membrane-anchored by single transmembrane domains. SNARE proteins are essential for intracellular membrane fusion along the secretory and endocytic pathway, while various viral fusogens mediate infection of eukaryotic cells by enveloped viruses. Although both types of fusion proteins are evolutionarily quite distant from each other, they do share a number of structural and functional features. Their transmembrane domains are now known to be critical for the fusion reaction. We discuss at which stages they might contribute to bilayer mixing. Received 5 October 2006; received after revision 14 November 2006; accepted 8 January 2007     

SNAREs and SNARE regulators in membrane fusion and exocytosis

Eukaryotes have a remarkably well-conserved apparatus for the trafficking of proteins between intracellular compartments and delivery to their target organelles. This apparatus comprises the secretory (or ‘protein export’) pathway, which is responsible for the proper processing and delivery of proteins and lipids, and is essential for the derivation and maintenance of those organelles. Protein transport between intracellular compartments is mediated by carrier vesicles that bud from one organelle and fuse selectively with another. Therefore, organelle-specific trafficking of vesicles requires specialized proteins that regulate vesicle transport, docking and fusion. These proteins are generically termed SNAREs and comprise evolutionarily conserved families of membrane-associated proteins (i.e. the synaptobrevin/VAMP, syntaxin and SNAP-25 families) which mediate membrane fusion. SNAREs act at all levels of the secretory pathway, but individual family members tend to be compartment-specific and, thus, are thought to contribute to the specificity of docking and fusion events. In this review, we describe the different SNARE families which function in exocytosis, as well as discuss the role of possible negative regulators (e.g. ‘SNARE-masters’) in mediating events leading to membrane fusion. A model to illustrate the dynamic cycling of SNAREs between fusion-incompetent and fusion-competent states, called the SNARE cycle, is presented. Received 8 October 1998; received after revision 26 November 1998; accepted 26 November 1998     

Membrane fusion

Summary The factors involved in the regulation of biological membrane fusion and models proposed for the molecular mechanism of biomembrane fusion are reviewed. The results obtained in model systems are critically discussed in the light of the known properties of biomembranes and characteristics of biomembrane fusion. Biological membrane fusion is a local-point event; extremely fast, non-leaky, and under strict control. Fusion follows on a local and most probably protein-modulated destabilization, and a transition of the interacting membranes from a bilayer to a non-bilayer lipid structure. The potential role of type II non-bilayer preferring lipids and of proteins in the local destabilization of the membranes is evaluated. Proteins are not only responsible for the mutual recognition of the fusion partners, but are most likely also to be involved in the initiation of biomembrane fusion, by locally producing or activating fusogens, or by acting as fusogens.     

Membrane fusion

The factors involved in the regulation of biological membrane fusion and models proposed for the molecular mechanism of biomembrane fusion are reviewed. The results obtained in model systems are critically discussed in the light of the known properties of biomembranes and characteristics of biomembrane fusion. Biological membrane fusion is a local-point event; extremely fast, non-leaky, and under strict control. Fusion follows on a local and most probably protein-modulated destabilization, and a transition of the interacting membranes from a bilayer to a non-bilayer lipid structure. The potential role of type II non-bilayer preferring lipids and of proteins in the local destabilization of the membranes is evaluated. Proteins are not only responsible for the mutual recognition of the fusion partners, but are most likely also to be involved in the initiation of biomembrane fusion, by locally producing or activating fusogens, or by acting as fusogens.     

Putting a brake on synaptic vesicle endocytosis

In chemical synapses, action potentials evoke synaptic vesicle fusion with the presynaptic membrane at the active zone to release neurotransmitter. Synaptic vesicle endocytosis (SVE) then follows exocytosis to recapture vesicle proteins and lipid components for recycling and the maintenance of membrane homeostasis. Therefore, SVE plays an essential role during neurotransmission and is one of the most precisely regulated biological processes. Four modes of SVE have been characterized and both positive and negative regulators have been identified. However, our understanding of SVE regulation remains unclear, especially the identity of negative regulators and their mechanisms of action. Here, we review the current knowledge of proteins that function as inhibitors of SVE and their modes of action in different forms of endocytosis. We also propose possible physiological roles of such negative regulation. We believe that a better understanding of SVE regulation, especially the inhibitory mechanisms, will shed light on neurotransmission in health and disease.     

Membrane traffic in the secretory pathway

SNARE (SNAP receptor) proteins drive intracellular membrane fusion and contribute specificity to membrane trafficking. The formation of SNAREpins between membranes is spatially and temporally controlled by a network of sequentially acting accessory components. These regulators add an additional layer of specificity, arrest SNAREpin intermediates, lower the energy required for fusion, and couple membrane fusion to triggering signals. The functional activity of some of these regulators determines the plasticity of regulated exocytosis. (Part of a Multi-author Review)     

Progress in understanding the neuronal SNARE function and its regulation

Vesicle budding and fusion underlies many essential biochemical deliveries in eukaryotic cells, and its core fusion machinery is thought to be built on one protein family named soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE). Recent technical advances based on site-directed fluorescence labelling and nano-scale detection down to the single-molecule level rapidly unveiled the protein and the lipid intermediates along the fusion pathway as well as the molecular actions of fusion effectors. Here we summarize these new exciting findings in context with a new mechanistic model that reconciles two existing fusion models: the proteinaceous pore model and the hemifusion model. Further, we attempt to locate the points of action for the fusion effectors along the fusion pathway and to delineate the energetic interplay between the SNARE complexes and the fusion effectors. Received 01 July 2008; received after revision 29 August 2008; accepted 23 September 2008     

The membrane domain of vacuolar H<Superscript>+</Superscript>ATPase: a crucial player in neurotransmitter exocytotic release

V-ATPases are multimeric enzymes made of two sectors, a V1 catalytic domain and a V0 membrane domain. They accumulate protons in various intracellular organelles. Acidification of synaptic vesicles by V-ATPase energizes the accumulation of neurotransmitters in these storage organelles and is therefore required for efficient synaptic transmission. In addition to this well-accepted role, functional studies have unraveled additional hidden roles of V0 in neurotransmitter exocytosis that are independent of the transport of protons. V0 interacts with SNAREs and calmodulin, and perturbing these interactions affects neurotransmitter release. Here, we discuss these data in relation with previous results obtained in reconstituted membranes and on yeast vacuole fusion. We propose that V0 could be a sensor of intra-vesicular pH that controls the exocytotic machinery, probably regulating SNARE complex assembly during the synaptic vesicle priming step, and that, during the membrane fusion step, V0 might favor lipid mixing and fusion pore stability.     

Membrane fusion: the process and its energy suppliers

Membrane fusion constitutes a pivotal process in eukaryotic cell physiology. Both specialized proteins and membrane lipids play key roles in fusion. Here, our current understanding of the mechanism of membrane fusion is reviewed. The focus is on the relatively simple and well-understood proteinaceous fusion machinery of enveloped viruses and the physical properties of lipids that appear to be of great relevance for fusion progression. Recent observations suggest that viral fusion proteins use packed conformational energy and bilayer-destabilizing domains to (i) bring participating membranes into intimate contact, (ii) merge proximal lipid monolayers through highly curved stalk/hemifusion intermediates, and (iii) generate a lipid-containing fusion pore, thereby terminating the fusion process. Received 4 January 2002; received after revision 3 April 2002; accepted 5 April 2002     

Regulation of mitochondrial dynamics: convergences and divergences between yeast and vertebrates

In eukaryotic cells, the shape of mitochondria can be tuned to various physiological conditions by a balance of fusion and fission processes termed mitochondrial dynamics. Mitochondrial dynamics controls not only the morphology but also the function of mitochondria, and therefore is crucial in many aspects of a cell’s life. Consequently, dysfunction of mitochondrial dynamics has been implicated in a variety of human diseases including cancer. Several proteins important for mitochondrial fusion and fission have been discovered over the past decade. However, there is emerging evidence that there are as yet unidentified proteins important for these processes and that the fusion/fission machinery is not completely conserved between yeast and vertebrates. The recent characterization of several mammalian proteins important for the process that were not conserved in yeast, may indicate that the molecular mechanisms regulating and controlling the morphology and function of mitochondria are more elaborate and complex in vertebrates. This difference could possibly be a consequence of different needs in the different cell types of multicellular organisms. Here, we review recent advances in the field of mitochondrial dynamics. We highlight and discuss the mechanisms regulating recruitment of cytosolic Drp1 to the mitochondrial outer membrane by Fis1, Mff, and MIEF1 in mammals and the divergences in regulation of mitochondrial dynamics between yeast and vertebrates.     

Bacterial protein toxins and cell vesicle trafficking

A group of bacterial protein toxins interfere with vesicular trafficking inside cells. Clostridial neurotoxins affect mainly the highly regulated fusion of neurotransmitter- and hormone-containing vesicles with the plasma membrane. They cleave the three SNARE proteins: VAMP, SNAP-25 and syntaxin, and this selective proteolysis results in a blockade of exocytosis. TheHelicobacter pylori cytotoxin is implicated in the pathogenesis of gastroduodenal ulcers. It causes a progressive and extensive vacuolation of cells followed by necrosis, after a cytotoxin-induced alteration of membrane trafficking by late endosomes. Vacuoles originate from this compartment in a rab7-dependent process and swell because they are acidic and accumulate membrane-permeant amines.     

Lipid sensing and lipid sensors

Translation of nutrient stimuli through intracellular signaling is important for adaptation and regulation of metabolic processes, while deregulation by either genetic or environmental factors predisposes towards the development of metabolic disorders. Besides providing energy, fatty acids act as prominent signaling molecules by altering cell membrane structures, affecting the lipid modification status of proteins, and by modulating ligand-activated nuclear receptor activity. Given their highly hydrophobic nature, fatty acids in the aqueous intracellular compartment are bound to small intracellular lipid binding proteins which function as intracellular carriers of these hydrophobic components. This review describes recent advances in identifying intracellular pathways for cytosolic fatty acid signaling through ligand activated receptors by means of small intracellular lipid binding proteins. The mechanism behind intracellular fatty acid transport and subsequent nuclear receptor activation is an emerging concept, and advances in understanding this process provide new potential therapeutic targets towards the treatment of metabolic disorders.     

Bridging the molecular and biological functions of the oxysterol-binding protein family

Oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) and OSBP-related proteins (ORPs) constitute a large eukaryotic gene family that transports and regulates the metabolism of sterols and phospholipids. The original classification of the family based on oxysterol-binding activity belies the complex dual lipid-binding specificity of the conserved OSBP homology domain (OHD). Additional protein- and membrane-interacting modules mediate the targeting of select OSBP/ORPs to membrane contact sites between organelles, thus positioning the OHD between opposing membranes for lipid transfer and metabolic regulation. This unique subcellular location, coupled with diverse ligand preferences and tissue distribution, has identified OSBP/ORPs as key arbiters of membrane composition and function. Here, we will review how molecular models of OSBP/ORP-mediated intracellular lipid transport and regulation at membrane contact sites relate to their emerging roles in cellular and organismal functions.     

Lipids in the cell: organisation regulates function

Lipids are fundamental building blocks of all cells and play important roles in the pathogenesis of different diseases, including inflammation, autoimmune disease, cancer, and neurodegeneration. The lipid composition of different organelles can vary substantially from cell to cell, but increasing evidence demonstrates that lipids become organised specifically in each compartment, and this organisation is essential for regulating cell function. For example, lipid microdomains in the plasma membrane, known as lipid rafts, are platforms for concentrating protein receptors and can influence intra-cellular signalling. Lipid organisation is tightly regulated and can be observed across different model organisms, including bacteria, yeast, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans, suggesting that lipid organisation is evolutionarily conserved. In this review, we summarise the importance and function of specific lipid domains in main cellular organelles and discuss recent advances that investigate how these specific and highly regulated structures contribute to diverse biological processes.     

Highly specific interactions between botulinum neurotoxins and synaptic vesicle proteins

Despite its extreme toxicity, botulinum neurotoxin is widely utilized in low doses as a treatment for several neurological disorders; higher doses cause the neuroparalytic syndrome botulism. The toxin blocks neurotransmitter release by preferentially attaching to pre-synaptic membrane receptors at neuromuscular junctions and subsequently delivering a Zn2+-dependent protease component to presynaptic neuronal cytosol. These highly specialized enzymes exclusively hydrolyze peptide bonds within SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleiamide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins. In this review we discuss the structural basis for botulinum toxin's exquisite specificity for its neuronal cell-surface receptors and intracellular SNARE targets.     

E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF13 involves spatial learning and assembly of the SNARE complex

Changes in the structure and number of synapses modulate learning, memory and cognitive disorders. Ubiquitin-mediated protein modification is a key mechanism for regulating synaptic activity, though the precise control of this process remains poorly understood. RING finger protein 13 (RNF13) is a recently identified E3 ubiquitin ligase, and its in vivo function remains completely unknown. We show here that genetic deletion of RNF13 in mice leads to a significant deficit in spatial learning as determined by the Morris water maze test and Y-maze learning test. At the ultrastructral level, the synaptic vesicle density was decreased and the area of the active zone was increased at hippocampal synapses of RNF13-null mice compared with those of wild-type littermates. We found no change in the levels of SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor-attachment protein receptor) complex proteins in the hippocampus of RNF13-null mice, but impaired SNARE complex assembly. RNF13 directly interacted with snapin, a SNAP-25-interacting protein. Interestingly, snapin was ubiquitinated by RNF13 via the lysine-29 conjugated polyubiquitin chain, which in turn promoted the association of snapin with SNAP-25. Consistently, we found an attenuated interaction between snapin and SNAP-25 in the RNF13-null mice. Therefore, these results suggest that RNF13 is involved in the regulation of the SNARE complex, which thereby controls synaptic function.     

Diacylglycerol kinases in nuclear lipid-dependent signal transduction pathways

Several independent groups have shown that lipid-dependent signal transduction systems operate in the nucleus and that they are regulated independently from their membrane and cytosolic counterparts. A sizable body of evidence suggests that nuclear lipid signaling controls critical biological functions such as cell proliferation and differentiation. Diacylglycerol is a fundamental lipid second messenger which is produced in the nucleus. The levels of nuclear diacylglycerol fluctuate during the cell cycle progression, suggesting that such a molecule has important regulatory roles. Most likely, nuclear diacylglycerol serves as a chemoattractant for some isoforms of protein kinase C that migrate to the nucleus in response to a variety of agonists. The nucleus also contains diacylglycerol kinases, i.e. the enzymes that, by converting diacylglycerol into phosphatidic acid, terminate diacylglycerol-dependent events. A number of diacylglycerol kinases encoded by separate genes are present in the mammalian genome. This review aims at highlighting the different isotypes of diacylglycerol kinases identified at the nuclear level as well as at discussing their potential function and regulation. Received 4 December 2001; received after revision 28 January 2002; accepted 31 January 2002     

Signalling roles of mammalian phospholipase D1 and D2

Phospholipase D (PLD) catalyses the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine to generate the lipid second messenger, phosphatidate (PA) and choline. PLD activity in mammalian cells is low and is transiently stimulated upon activation by G-protein-coupled and receptor tyrosine kinase cell surface receptors. Two mammalian PLD enzymes (PLD1 and PLD2) have been cloned and their intracellular regulators identified as ARF and Rho proteins, protein kinase Cα as well as the lipid, phosphatidylinositol [4, 5] bisphosphate (PIP₂). I discuss the regulation of these enzymes by cell surface receptors, their cellular localisation and the potential function of PA as a second messenger. Evidence is presented for a role of PA in regulating the lipid kinase activity of PIP 5-kinase, an enzyme that synthesises PIP₂. A signalling role of phospholipase D via PA and indirectly via PIP₂ in regulating membrane traffic and actin dynamics is indicated by the available data. Received 25 April 2001; received after revision 15 June 2001; accepted 15 June 2001     

Genetic and molecular analysis of the synaptotagmin family

Secretion is a fundamental cellular process used by all eukaryotes to insert proteins into the plasma membrane and transport signaling molecules and intravesicular proteins into the extracellular space. Secretion requires the fusion of two phospholipid bilayers within the cell, an energetically unfavorable process. A conserved repertoire of vesicle-trafficking proteins has evolved that function to overcome this energy barrier and temporally and spatially control membrane fusion within the cell. Within neurons, opening of synaptic calcium channels and subsequent calcium entry triggers synchronous synaptic vesicle exocytosis and neurotransmitter release into the synaptic cleft. After fusion, synaptic vesicles undergo endocytosis, are refilled with neurotransmitter, and return to the vesicle pool for further rounds of cycling. It is within this local synaptic trafficking pathway that the synaptotagmin family of calcium-binding synaptic vesicle proteins has been postulated to function. Here we review the current literature on the function of the synaptotagmin family and discuss the implications for synaptic transmission and membrane trafficking. Received 14 August 2000; received after revision 20 September 2000, accepted 14 October 2000     

Lipid flippases and their biological functions

The typically distinct phospholipid composition of the two leaflets of a membrane bilayer is generated and maintained by bi-directional transport (flip-flop) of lipids between the leaflets. Specific membrane proteins, termed lipid flippases, play an essential role in this transport process. Energy-independent flippases allow common phospholipids to equilibrate rapidly between the two monolayers and also play a role in the biosynthesis of a variety of glycoconjugates such as glycosphingolipids, N-glycoproteins, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins. ATP-dependent flippases, including members of a conserved subfamily of P-type ATPases and ATP-binding cassette transporters, mediate the net transfer of specific phospholipids to one leaflet of a membrane and are involved in the creation and maintenance of transbilayer lipid asymmetry of membranes such as the plasma membrane of eukaryotes. Energy-dependent flippases also play a role in the biosynthesis of glycoconjugates such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide. This review summarizes recent progress on the identification and characterization of the various flippases and the demonstration of their biological functions. Received 12 April 2006; received after revision 22 June 2006; accepted 30 August 2006