首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于证据理论和直觉模糊集的群决策信息集结方法
引用本文:陈云翔,蔡忠义,张诤敏,项华春.基于证据理论和直觉模糊集的群决策信息集结方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2015,37(3):594-598.
作者姓名:陈云翔  蔡忠义  张诤敏  项华春
作者单位:空军工程大学装备管理与安全工程学院, 陕西 西安 710051
基金项目:总装“十二五”国防预先研究项目资助课题
摘    要:针对多属性群决策信息集结问题,利用D S证据理论和直觉模糊集的相关方法,提出基于直觉模糊熵的属性权重确定方法,并将专家对属性的直觉模糊评价信息转化为Mass函数形式,将专家关于方案集的多属性证据信息进行了修正和合成;为了便于度量任意两个专家之间评价证据的冲突程度,提出基于证据冲突度的专家权重确定方法,并将所有专家关于方案集的证据信息进行修正和综合集成。结合算例验证了方法的有效性和合理性。

关 键 词:多属性群决策  D-S证据合成  直觉模糊熵  证据冲突度

Method for group decision-making information integration based on evidence theory and intuitionistic fuzzy set
CHEN Yun-xiang;CAI Zhong-yi;ZHANG Zheng-min;XIANG Hua-chun.Method for group decision-making information integration based on evidence theory and intuitionistic fuzzy set[J].System Engineering and Electronics,2015,37(3):594-598.
Authors:CHEN Yun-xiang;CAI Zhong-yi;ZHANG Zheng-min;XIANG Hua-chun
Institution:Equipment Management & Safety Engineering College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710051, China
Abstract:For information integration of multi-attribute group decision-making, the paper uses the Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory and relevant theories of the intuitionistic fuzzy set, puts forward a method for attribution-weight determination based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy, turns the intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation information of the attribute into the Mass function form, and modifies and synthesizes the multi-attribute of the expert group towards the project set. In order to get the conflict degree of two experts’ evaluation evidence, the paper puts forward a method for expert-weight determination based on the evidence conflict degree, and modifies and integrates the evidence information of all experts towards the project set. An example is used to verify the effectiveness and rationality of this method.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《系统工程与电子技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《系统工程与电子技术》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号