| 实验的关键性与说服力——析富兰克林的科学合理性辩护策略 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王延锋.实验的关键性与说服力——析富兰克林的科学合理性辩护策略[J].自然辩证法研究,2011(8). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王延锋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海交通大学人文学院科学史系; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 迪昂—蒯因命题、观察渗透理论、新旧范式不可通约等论题,对自然科学建立在坚实的实验基础之上的传统观念构成巨大挑战,科学的合理性成为问题。当代新实验主义主要代表人物阿兰.富兰克林从现代物理学实验个案研究出发,提出实验的关键性和说服力两个概念:面对相竞争的理论假设,实验能够起到关键性的判别作用;面对旧理论的牢固地位,有说服力的实验数据能够改变科学家的信念;实验在现代科学中的基础性地位无可置疑,建立在实验基础之上的现代物理学是合理的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 富兰克林 新实验主义 科学合理性 |
Crucial Experimentation and Convincing Experimentation: On Franklin's Science Rationality Tactics |
| |
| WANG Yan-feng.Crucial Experimentation and Convincing Experimentation: On Franklin's Science Rationality Tactics[J].Studies In Dialectics of Nature,2011(8). |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Yan-feng |
| |
| Institution: | WANG Yan-feng (Department for the History & Philosophy of Science,Shanghai Jiaotong University,200240,Shanghai,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Duhem-Quine thesis,theory-loading of observations and the incommensurability of paradigms launch an attack on the rationality of scientific knowledge.Allan Franklin,a representative figure of New Experimentalism,defended the rationality of science from the case studies of modern physics experimentations.He proposed two concepts: crucial experimentation and convincing experimentation.When encountered competitive hypothesis,crucial experimentation can serve as judgment,while some convincing experimentations c... |
| |
| Keywords: | Allan Franklin new experimentalism rationality of science |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
