文献史料：“为何”以及“如何”进入当代文学史

学界以往对文献史料之于当代文学研究意义的重要性认识不足．一定程度上可以归固于对当代文学史研究作为断代史和专门史的属性有所忽略．对当代文学史叙述的任务和目标比较模糊．以及对当代文学的特赇性缺乏足够的自觉。在文献史料的运用上，既有囿于研究者的史学意识和史料视野，大量新发掘的文献史料没有进入文学史，导致一些流行的偏见仍是文学史上难以撼动的“钉子户”；也有在写作上未能将文献史料与作家的文学行为分析、优美作品的深度阐释、文学史价值的重构与发现有机地加以融合的问题。以作家的“文学行为实存分析”为中心,结合政治、制度、文化的考察．融合事件、思潮、作家、作品．叙述出文体演化史、思潮流变史、审美风尚史以及作家作品史齐头并进、杂糅无间的当代文学发生发展的生动和流动的景象,应是文学史叙述追求的一种新的境界。

Why and How Can Historical Documents Go into Contemporary Literature History

There is a lack of understanding on the significance of historical documents to contemporary literature study among the academia, which may be attributed to the ignorance of the characteristics of contemporary literary study as dynastic history and special history, unclear tasks and goals of contemporary literature history and inadequate awareness of specialty of contemporary literature. As far as the application is concerned, many newly-discovered historical documents fail to come into the academic study due to the limited historical knowledge, which results in a popular prejudice about literature history. In addition, there also exist such problems in writing as follows - the failure of analysis between historical documents and writer＇s literary behavior, deep interpretation on elegant literary works and the integration between reconstruction and discovery of literature history value. With the writer＇s literary existential analysis being the core, the literature historical study is in the pursuit of an ideal prospect： to describe the advancement of style evolution history, ideological trend history, aesthetic fashion history and the history of the writer＇s works through the observation of politics, systems and culture, as well as the events, ideas, writers and works.