从"可证伪度"、"确认度"到"逼真度"

波普尔的证伪主义方法论是否具有只重视经验证伪而完全否认经验“证实”的片面性,学术界对此的回答基本上是肯定的;而他的科学哲学思想是否前后一致,则是学术界的一个重大分歧。本文试沿着波普尔的思想轨迹,通过对他先后提出的三个理论评价标准的深入剖析,阐明了自己的看法。

From"Degree of Falsification", "Degree of Corroboration" to "Degree of Versimilitude"

Whether Karl Popper's methodology of falsificationism only pays attention to the principle of experiential falsification and completely denies the importance of experiential"verificaiton" ,our academic circles generally give it an affirmative answer. Can Popper's science philosophy keep consistent from start to finish? It is stilla a major difference at present. Following the development of Popper' s thoughts, this article expounds its views on the questions above by analysing the three judgement standards on science theory presented in different periods by Popper deeply.