| 周作人钱钟书有关文学史论争之述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李光摩.周作人钱钟书有关文学史论争之述评[J].韶关学院学报,2008,29(7):11-14. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李光摩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华南师范大学文学院,广东广州,510631 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 周作人试图以“言志”与“载道”建构一部中国文学史，钱钟书则认为“言志”与“载道”分别对应两种文体，即诗歌与散文。经过几番论争，两人各有坚持和妥协。在论争的背后，则隐含着两人不同的思想方式。
|
| 关 键 词： | 周作人 钱钟书 载道 言志 论争 |
Commentary on the Argument Between Zhou Zuoren and Qian Zhongshu on the History of Chinese Literature |
| |
| LI Guang-mo.Commentary on the Argument Between Zhou Zuoren and Qian Zhongshu on the History of Chinese Literature[J].Journal of Shaoguan University(Social Science Edition),2008,29(7):11-14. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Guang-mo |
| |
| Institution: | LI Guang-mo (College of Literature, South Chinese Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, Guangdong, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Mr. Zhou Zuoren tried to construct a history of Chinese literature by using the conflict of ＂Yanzhi＂ and ＂Zaidao＂, while Mr. Qian Zhongshu believed that the two were correspondent to two different literary styles, i.e. poetry and prose. After several arguments, each of the two still has his own persistence and compromise, which told us the different modes of thought of the two scholars. |
| |
| Keywords: | Zhou Zuoren Qian Zhongshu ＂Zaidao＂ ＂Yanzhi＂ argument |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
