首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

两种砂岩碎屑组分统计方法的比较
引用本文:储书武,李双应.两种砂岩碎屑组分统计方法的比较[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,30(6):668-671.
作者姓名:储书武  李双应
作者单位:合肥工业大学,资源与环境工程学院,安徽合肥,230009
摘    要:砂岩碎屑组分统计是确定岩石类型和物源区特征的主要方法之一,常常采用的方法有目估法、面积法、直线法和点计法。文章利用误差分析、相关性分析和Dickinson源区构造背景判别三角图,比较了直线法和点计法的差别;实验数据分析表明,2种方法测量结果之间存在的差异微小,对岩石类型以及物源区的判别不受影响。但是,点计法在砂岩碎屑组分统计中,具有简单、方便、省时的特点,可以广泛应用。

关 键 词:砂岩碎屑组分  统计  直线法  点计法
文章编号:1003-5060(2007)06-0668-04
修稿时间:2007年3月9日

Comparison between two methods for statistical study of detrital composition of sandstones
CHU Shu-wu,LI Shuang-ying.Comparison between two methods for statistical study of detrital composition of sandstones[J].Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Natural Science),2007,30(6):668-671.
Authors:CHU Shu-wu  LI Shuang-ying
Abstract:The statistical study of detrital composition of sandstones is carried out in order to distinguish rock types and features of provenance,and the common statistical methods includes the visual estimation method,the area-counting method,the line-counting method,and the point-counting.In the paper,the differences between the line-counting method and the point-counting method are compared by means of error analysis,correlation analysis and the Dickinson triangle diagram of structure background of provenance.Analysis of the experimental data shows that there are some tiny differences between the measured results of the two methods,but the discrimination of rock types and features of provenance is not affected.By comparison with the line-counting method,the point-counting method is easier and more convenient and efficient,so it can be used widely.
Keywords:detrital composition of sandstones  statistics  line-counting method  point-counting method
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号