首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


I   s
Affiliation:1. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;2. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada;3. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore;4. Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada;5. Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada;6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, China;7. National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen, China;8. Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen, China;1. Institute of Information and Control, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China;2. Institute of Cyber-Systems and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;3. School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
Abstract:Richard Arthur (2006) and I (Savitt, 2009) proposed that the present in (time-oriented) Minkowski spacetime should be thought of as a small causal diamond. That is, given two timelike separated events p and q, with p earlier than q, we suggested that the present (relative to those two events) is the set I+(p)∩I-(q). Mauro Dorato (2011) presents three criticisms of this proposal. I rebut all three and then examine two more plausible criticisms of the Arthur/Savitt proposal. I argue that these criticisms also fail.
Keywords:Time  Relativity  The present  Causal diamond
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号