首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

热激活建筑系统研究进展
引用本文:陈萨如拉,常甜馨,杨洋,张智,郭安妮. 热激活建筑系统研究进展[J]. 科技导报(北京), 2022, 40(22): 55-65. DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.22.006
作者姓名:陈萨如拉  常甜馨  杨洋  张智  郭安妮
作者单位:安徽建筑大学安徽省国土空间规划与生态研究院,合肥230601;安徽建筑大学建筑与规划学院,合肥230601;西部绿色建筑国家重点实验室,西安710055;合肥工业大学建筑与艺术学院,合肥230601;西部绿色建筑国家重点实验室,西安710055;安徽安天利信工程管理股份有限公司,合肥230071;安徽建筑大学安徽省国土空间规划与生态研究院,合肥230601;安徽建筑大学建筑与规划学院,合肥230601
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFE0200100);国家自然科学基金项目(52208103);安徽省自然科学基金项目(2108085QE241,2208085QE163);安徽省国土空间规划与生态研究院开放课题(AHJZNX-2021-03);安徽省住房城乡建设科学技术计划项目(2022-YF062);中国-葡萄牙文化遗产保护科学“一带一路”联合实验室建开放课题(SDYY2102);西部绿色建筑国家重点实验室开放基金项目(LSKF202303)
摘    要:基于控制围护结构传热温差而提出的热激活建筑系统(TABS),可利用注入低品位能源形成热屏障的方式降低建筑负荷,是实现建筑能碳双控目标的重要措施。提出了TABS分类与评价方法,从热工性能、集成设计、可持续性和应用潜力等角度对空气基、液体基和固体基TABS进行了梳理与对比分析。现有研究表明:集成空气基TABS的围护结构当量传热系数小于0.3 W/(m2·K),渗透型还具备热回收与空气净化的双重效果;液体基TABS在一体化集成和热激活效能方面更具优势,围护结构当量传热系数可降至-3.6 W/(m2·K);固体基TABS则具有无循环工质、无运动部件和无噪音等优点,围护结构当量传热系数可降至-3.0W/(m2·K),但未来需要解决其立面集成和热电模块商业化等问题。

关 键 词:热激活建筑系统  围护结构  分类方法  性能评价  传热系数
收稿时间:2022-04-18

Research progress on thermo-activated building system
CHEN Sarula,CHANG Tianxin,YANG Yang,ZHANG Zhi,GUO Anni. Research progress on thermo-activated building system[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40(22): 55-65. DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2022.22.006
Authors:CHEN Sarula  CHANG Tianxin  YANG Yang  ZHANG Zhi  GUO Anni
Affiliation:1. Anhui Institute of Territorial Space Planning and Ecology, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China;
2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China;
3. College of Architecture and Art, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China;
4. State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, Xi'an 710055, China;
5. Anhui AHTECH Lixin Engineering Management Co., Ltd., Hefei 230071, China
Abstract:The thermo-activated building system (TABS), which is considered to be an important measure to achieve the goal of dual control of energy and carbon in buildings, can reduce the building load by injecting low-grade energy to form a thermal barrier. The proposed system is based on controlling the heat transfer temperature difference of the envelope. This paper presents the classification and evaluation methods of TABS, and systematically compares and analyzes air-based, liquid-based and solidbased TABS from the perspectives of thermal performance, integrated design, sustainability and application potential. Existing studies show that the equivalent heat transfer coefficient of the envelope integrated with air-based TABS is less than 0.3 W/(m2· K). Permeable air-based TABS also has the dual effect of heat recovery and air purification; Liquid-based TABS is more advantageous in terms of integration and operational energy efficiency, with an equivalent heat transfer coefficient of the envelope down to -3.6 W/(m2·K); Solid-based TABS has the advantages of no working fluid, no moving parts and no noise, and its envelope equivalent heat transfer coefficient can be reduced to -3.0 W/(m2·K). However, issues such as its façade integration and commercialization of thermoelectric modules need to be addressed in the future.
Keywords:thermo-activated building system  building envelope  classification method  performance evaluation  heat transfer coefficient  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技导报(北京)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技导报(北京)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号