首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我国平原农区林带胁地效应及其控制措施研究进展
引用本文:胡海波,贾西川. 我国平原农区林带胁地效应及其控制措施研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2): 234-240. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201911037
作者姓名:胡海波  贾西川
作者单位:南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏省水土保持与生态修复重点实验室,江苏 南京 210037
基金项目:江苏省农业科技自主创新重大项目(CX(17)1004-2);国家林业局长江三角洲森林生态系统定位研究项目(2018-LYPT-DW-159);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)。
摘    要:总结了近年来我国农田防护林林带尤其平原农区林带胁地的研究成果,以揭示农田防护林的胁地规律及其影响因素,并探讨克服胁地的措施.分析认为:①我国各地区由于地理位置、自然条件以及树种生物学等的差异,农田防护林的胁地范围也不同,在平原农区其胁地范围按程度大小分别为0~[0.4H,2.0H](H为林带平均高度,胁地程度大小依次为...

关 键 词:农田防护林  胁地  控制措施
收稿时间:2019-11-15

Review on negative effects and its control measures of forest belt in plain agricultural areas of China
HU Haibo,JIA Xichuan. Review on negative effects and its control measures of forest belt in plain agricultural areas of China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences ), 2021, 45(2): 234-240. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201911037
Authors:HU Haibo  JIA Xichuan
Affiliation:(Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China)
Abstract:The paper summarized the research results of farmland shelterbelt on negative effect(output reduction)and its control measures in China in recent years, especially in plain agricultural areas so as to explore the degree of output reduction and its influencing factors, and to find an effective way to reduce the negative effects. The results were as follows:(1) Because of the differences in geographical location, natural conditions and tree species biology, the negative effect distance of shelterbelts was different. But in plain agricultural areas, the negative effect distance of shelterbelts in China was 0~[0.4H,2.0H](H was the average height of shelterbelt. The degree of threatened land was 0.4H, 0.5H, 0.6H,…, 2.0H, etc. The same below.), and the negative effect distance of the most shelterbelts was 0~[0.8H,1.5H].(2) The influence of different direction shelterbelts on the negative effect was different, and if the shelterbelt was north-south direction, the range of the western negative effect was larger that was 0.4H-1.5H;while for east-west direction shelterbelt, the northern range of negative effect was larger that was 0.4H-2.0H. The range and degree of the northern area of the negative effect was the largest, and the southern range of the negative effect was the smallest.(3) Although the east-west direction shelterbelt can reduce the shade area more than the north-south direction shelterbelt, it may not increase the yield.(4) Increasing the distance between the shelterbelt and the farmland, planting narrow canopy tree species, strengthening the pruning and selecting the suitable crops were the most effective methods to reduce the negative effect of crown;the most effective method of reducing negative effect of the root was to cut the root and stick the film.
Keywords:farmland shelterbelt  negative effect(output reduction)  control measure
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号