Misleading observable analogues in paleontology |
| |
Authors: | Derek D. Turner |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Philosophy, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT 06320, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Carman argues, in ‘The electrons of the dinosaurs and the center of the Earth’, that we may have more reason to be realists about dinosaurs than about electrons, because there are plenty of observable analogues for dinosaurs but not for electrons. These observable analogues severely restrict the range of plausible ontologies, thus reducing the threat of underdetermination. In response to this argument, I show that the observable analogues for ancient organisms are a mixed epistemic blessing at best, and I discuss some cases from the history of paleontology in which the observable analogues—ducks, shrimp, and lizards—have led scientists into persisting error. I also give reasons for thinking that underdetermination will be just as serious a problem in historical as in experimental science. I conclude that Carman has not succeeded in showing that dinosaurs ‘come off better’ than electrons. |
| |
Keywords: | Paleontology Pessimistic induction Realism Unobservables |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|