首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“北川模式”与几种纠纷解决机制的比较研究
引用本文:刘永强,乔闻钟.“北川模式”与几种纠纷解决机制的比较研究[J].绵阳经济技术高等专科学校学报,2009(1):16-20.
作者姓名:刘永强  乔闻钟
作者单位:西南科技大学法学院,四川绵阳621010
基金项目:本文系四川省社科基金项目:“社会矛盾的多元化纠纷解决机制问题研究”(校内编号07SS3107)阶段性成果之一.
摘    要:在我国经济社会快速发展的过程中,各类社会矛盾纠纷日益凸显,不断探索解决社会矛盾纠纷的新机制,成为当前法学研究与法律实践中的热点之一。“北川模式”、“南通模式”、“厦门模式”、“陵县经验”、“枫桥经验”是几种有代表性的社会矛盾纠纷解决机制,通过对它们各自基本内涵的异同进行比较后发现,“北川模式”更符合多元化纠纷解决机制的要求,更值得借鉴与推广。

关 键 词:纠纷解决机制  北川模式  比较

The Comparitive Study of "Beichuan Pattern" and Other Dispute Resolutions
LIU Yong-qiang,QIAO Wen-zhong.The Comparitive Study of "Beichuan Pattern" and Other Dispute Resolutions[J].Journal of Mianyang College of Economy & Technology,2009(1):16-20.
Authors:LIU Yong-qiang  QIAO Wen-zhong
Institution:( School of Law, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan, China)
Abstract:Along with the development of the society and economy, several social disputes reveal day by day. Thus, exploring the new dispute resolutions becomes the hotspot of legal research and application. In this paper, we compare several typical dispute resolutions such as "Beichuan Pattern", "Nantong Pattern", " Xia' men Patten Linxian Pattern" and "Fengqiao Pattern" and find out that "Beichuan Pattern" fits the requirment of the diverse dispute resolutions bettern than others.
Keywords:Dispute resolution mechanism  Beichuan mode  Comparison
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号