首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

点动态学方程几种解法的比较
引用本文:经荥清,李君利,罗经宇.点动态学方程几种解法的比较[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1995(3).
作者姓名:经荥清  李君利  罗经宇
作者单位:清华大学核能技术设计研究院
基金项目:国家“863”高科技项目
摘    要:本文系统介绍了点动态学方程的各种解法及其特点,并对其中影响较大的三种方法Gear法、三阶Hermite插值法以及PpqM法的截断误差和稳定性进行了讨论。最后,本文利用所编制的三种方法的程序对轻水堆和快堆的标准问题进行了校算,结果证明PpqM法可以有效地求解点动态学方程,它所用的计算时间短而且结果也更精确。

关 键 词:动态学方程  点堆模型  刚性问题  计算效率

Comparison of different solutions for point kinetics equations
Jing Xingqing,Li Junli,Luo Jingyu.Comparison of different solutions for point kinetics equations[J].Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology),1995(3).
Authors:Jing Xingqing  Li Junli  Luo Jingyu
Abstract:he various methods for point kinetics equations are introduced systematically inthis paper, with their different features presented. Then three of these methods, includingGear linear multi-step method, three-order Hermite polynomials method and P,, Mpolynomials approximations, which have great influences on other methods and have beenattached great attentions in other papers, are discussed on their truncation errors andstability characters. Finally, benchmark problems for both light water reactors and liquidmetal fast breeder reactors are calculated by programs of these three methods to check thecalculating efficiency of them. The Ppq M method is considered to solve point kineticsequations efficiently, which uses less CPU time, and its calculation results are moreaccurate.
Keywords:kinetics equations  point reactor model  stiffness  calculating efficiency
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号