首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

黄河下游花园口至艾山河段滩区洪水漫滩风险度评估研究
引用本文:孙煜航,程舒鹏,张祺,杜鹏举,李振山,赵志杰.黄河下游花园口至艾山河段滩区洪水漫滩风险度评估研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(3):575-586.
作者姓名:孙煜航  程舒鹏  张祺  杜鹏举  李振山  赵志杰
作者单位:1. 北京大学深圳研究生院环境与能源学院, 深圳 518055 2. 北京大学环境科学与工程学院, 国家环境保护河流全物质通量重点实验室, 北京 100871
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0402505)资助
摘    要:利用Delft3D模型, 模拟黄河下游滩区洪水漫滩过程, 获取漫滩范围和洪水淹没水深等洪水致灾参数。基于地形和防洪条件, 划分洪水漫滩淹没单元, 参考联合国灾害风险评价指标体系, 结合对各淹没单元的危险度和易损度评估, 得到不同洪水量级下各淹没单元的洪水漫滩风险度空间分布。结果表明, 占滩区总面积近 50%的淹没单元的洪水漫滩风险等级随洪水量级的增加而稳步增加, 为“水险同期”类淹没单元; 39.7%的淹没单元在十年一遇洪水情景下呈现极高风险度状态, 即“小水大险”状态; 11.67%的淹没单元稳定地处于相对较低的风险度等级, 漫滩风险不受洪水量级影响, 为“稳定低险”类。因此, 对于黄河下游滩区洪水漫滩风险, 应当重点防范主要集中分布在高村至艾山河段的“小水大险”类淹没单元, 同时应以十年一遇, 甚至五年一遇的洪水情景作为洪水防范工程措施布设的参考依据。

关 键 词:黄河下游  滩区  洪水  水动力模拟  风险评价  
收稿时间:2020-03-30

Research on Flood Risk Assessment of Floodplains from Huayuankou to Aishan Section in the Lower Yellow River
SUN Yuhang,CHENG Shupeng,ZHANG Qi,DU Pengju,LI Zhenshan,ZHAO Zhijie.Research on Flood Risk Assessment of Floodplains from Huayuankou to Aishan Section in the Lower Yellow River[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2021,57(3):575-586.
Authors:SUN Yuhang  CHENG Shupeng  ZHANG Qi  DU Pengju  LI Zhenshan  ZHAO Zhijie
Institution:

1. School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055

2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of All Material Fluxes in River Ecosystems, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Abstract:The Delft3D model was used to simulate the flooding process on floodplains of the Lower Yellow River, and the flood disaster parameters such as flooding range and flooding depth were statistically calculated from the model. The process of giving the flood risk’s spatial distribution of the plains includes dividing the hazard-vulnerability units and calculating the hazard and vulnerability of each unit according to the topography and flood-control measures. The United Nations risk assessment index system is used to give out the spatial distribution of the flood risk for each inundation unit. The results show that the relationship between flood risk and flood scenarios response across the study area can be divided into three categories. About 50% of the plain are under “simultaneous flooding and risks”, which means the flood risk level generally varies with the flood scenario. 39.7% of the plains own the trait of “low flooding frequency leads to giant risks”, and for the unit of this category basically has the extreme risk even for the 10-year frequency floods. 11.67% of the plain are stable at a relatively low risk situation, and the flood risk is not affected by the magnitude of the flood, which is classified as “stable low risks”. In order to prevent the flood risk of the Lower Yellow River, the flooding unit of “low flooding frequency leads to giant risks” mainly distributed in Gaocun to Aishan section should give a priority to take the action, and the flood situation of once every ten years or even once every five years should be taken as the reference basis for building flood prevention measures.
Keywords:the Lower Yellow River  plains  flood  hydrodynamics simulation  risk assessment  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号