| 论人格权宪法化的两种模式及其启示 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 骆正言.论人格权宪法化的两种模式及其启示[J].温州大学学报(自然科学版),2013(6):97-102. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 骆正言 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏开放大学公共管理系,江苏南京210038 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目（10YJC820081）;安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般项目（2010sk168） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 二十世纪后半期以后,宪法以两种方式影响了私法上的人格权的发展,一是德国模式,以宪法直接推出个别人格权,二是美国模式,以宪法革新传统人格权,两种方式均是两国法律制度自然发展的产物.然而无论哪种模式,人格权宪法化都不同程度地具有提升人格权地位、创新人格权类型、增强人格权灵活性的功能.以我国目前人格权立法简约、司法机械的境况,适度采纳人格权宪法化的经验是未来人格权保护的必由之路.
|
| 关 键 词： | 人格权的宪法化 人格权的创新 宪法的适用 司法权的能动性 |
On Two Constitutionalized Models of Personality Rights and Their Enlightenment |
| |
| LUO Zhengyan.On Two Constitutionalized Models of Personality Rights and Their Enlightenment[J].Journal of Wenzhou University,2013(6):97-102. |
| |
| Authors: | LUO Zhengyan |
| |
| Institution: | LUO Zhengyan (Department of Public Administration, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, China 210038) |
| |
| Abstract: | From the second half of the 20th century, constitution has influenced the development of personality rights in private law in two ways. One is Germany model in which the constitution directly develops into concrete personality rights, and the other is U. S. model in which constitution reforms traditional personality rights. Both models are the natural outcomes of their legal institution development. Anyway, constitutionalisation of personality rights can heighten the status of personality rights, produce new personality rights, and soften personality rights to some extent. In view of the status quo of simplicity of personality rights in legislation and mechanical judiciary, it is a necessary way for China＇s future protection of personality rights to constitutionalize personality rights to some degree . |
| |
| Keywords: | Constitutionalisation of Personality Right Innovation of Personanlity Right Application of the Constitution Judicial Activism |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
