| 也论公平责任原则 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 雷群安. 也论公平责任原则[J]. 韶关学院学报, 2005, 26(7): 16-19 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 雷群安 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 韶关学院,法律学系,广东,韶关,512005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 公平责任原则上升为一般性的归责原则，在逻辑上易产生冲突，实务中也难以操作。因此，在我国的侵权行为法中，不能从侵权责任归责原则的角度来认识公平责任，也不宜使用公平责任原则的提法，应该把公平责任作为无过错责任的一种类型来认识和理解，并应最终将其功能归还给社会保障和社会保险制度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 侵权行为法 归责原则 公平责任原则 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-5348(2005)07-0016-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-03-25 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-25 |
Research into the Equitable Liability Doctrine |
| |
| LEI Qun-an. Research into the Equitable Liability Doctrine[J]. Journal of Shaoguan University(Social Science Edition), 2005, 26(7): 16-19 |
| |
| Authors: | LEI Qun-an |
| |
| Abstract: | The rise of equitable liability doctrine to a general doctrine of liability fixation will lead to logical controversies as well as impractical manipulation. Therefore, we cannot comprehend equitable liability from the perspective of doctrine of liability fixation for tort, nor shall we propose equitable liability doctrine in our tort law.Instead, we should recognize and comprehend equitable liability as one type of no-fauh liability, and attribute the function of equitable liability to social security system. |
| |
| Keywords: | tort act doctrine of liability fixation equitable liability doctrine |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
