| 也论马克思哲学研究中的合法性问题——答仰海峰先生 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱宝信.也论马克思哲学研究中的合法性问题——答仰海峰先生[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版),2001(3):64-69. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱宝信 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 驻马店市卫生学校,河南,驻马店,463000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于马克思哲学的博大精深和我国社会变革的急剧性,对马克思哲学作出多种解释是不可避免的,又由于哲学解释有“义理明”和“训诂明”之分,以及哲学所具有的无法经验确定的超验性,对马克思哲学多种解释的合法性判定,就只能依据不矛盾律和充足理由律,以及接受者方面的“相信”程度,仅承认一种解释合法其他解释不合法,这种做法是不尽妥当的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 哲学研究 马克思哲学 合法性 主观因素 客观因素 实践唯物主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-733X(2001)03-0064-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年3月9日 |
Taiks on Marx's Philosophy's Legality |
| |
| ZHU,Bao,xin.Taiks on Marx's Philosophy's Legality[J].Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Science Edition),2001(3):64-69. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHU Bao xin |
| |
| Abstract: | As Marx's philosophy is broad and profound, china social refom is rapid, so many kinds of explanation on Marx's philophy is natural. Explanation onphilosphy can be classified "basis on principle" and "basis on investigation", at the same time, the future of philosophy is that it can't determine throuyh experience, if we want to judye the legality of explanation on Marx's philosophy, only can according to "basis on principale" and "basis on investigation", accepter's level of belif is important factor. It is not preper that admit one kind of explanation is legal expland the others illegal. |
| |
| Keywords: | Marx's philosophy legality subjective factor objective factor |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
