首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Edge cases in animal research law: Constituting the regulatory borderlands of the UK's Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act
Authors:Alexandra Palmer  Reuben Message  Beth Greenhough
Institution:1. School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;2. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Abstract:This paper explores how the boundaries of the UK's Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (A(SP)A) are constituted, as illustrative of the rising importance of legal procedures around animal research and how these are continuously being challenged and questioned. Drawing on empirical work in animal research communities, we consider how it is decided whether activities are undertaken for an “experimental or other scientific purpose”. We do this by focusing on “edge cases”, where debates occur about whether to include an activity within A(SP)A's remit. We demonstrate that the boundaries of animal research regulation in the UK are products of past and present decisions, dependencies, and social relationships. Boundaries are therefore not clear-cut and fixed, but rather flexible and changing borderlands. We particularly highlight the roles of: historical precedent; the management of risk, workload, and cost; institutional and professional identities; and research design in constituting A(SP)A's edges. In doing so, we demonstrate the importance of paying attention to how, in practice, animal law requires a careful balance between adhering to legal paragraphs and allowing for discretion. This in turn has real-world implications for what and how science is done, who does it, and how animals are used in its service.
Keywords:Animal research  Borderlands  Boundary work  Law  Regulation  Risk management
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号