Circularity,indispensability, and mathematical explanation in science |
| |
Authors: | Alan Baker |
| |
Institution: | 1. University of Cincinnati, USA;2. University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In this paper I consider the objection that the Enhanced Indispensability Argument (EIA) is circular and hence fails to support mathematical platonism. The objection is that the explanandum in any mathematical explanation of a physical phenomenon is itself identified using mathematical concepts. Hence the explanandum is only genuine if the truth of some mathematical theory is already presupposed. I argue that this objection deserves to be taken seriously, that it does sometimes undermine support for EIA, but that there is no reason to think that circularity is an unavoidable feature of mathematical explanation in science. |
| |
Keywords: | Platonism Circularity Indispensability Mathematical explanation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|