| Ecological Carrying Capacity of Tibet China——Variety of Ecological Footprints from 1978 to 2002 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | LIUXiao-bao GAOJi-xi LoriAnnaConzo GAOMing-gang HEPing |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]InstituteofMountainHazardsandEnvironment,ChineseAcademyofSciences＆MinistryofWaterConser-vancy,Chengdu610041,Sichuan,China [2]InnovationBaseofRegionalEcologicalEnvironmentProtection,ChineseResearchAcademyofEnvironmentalSciences,Beijing100012,China; [3]D＇AppoloniaS.p.A.,Genova,Italy16145 [4]WeifangCollege,Weifang261061,Shandong,China |
| |
| 摘 要： | Ecological footprint‘ s theory and method are used to calculate and analysis the ecological carrying capacity in Tibet. The results indicate: Tibet ecological footprint (2.1 hm^2) keeps higher than countrywide average level( 1.5hm^2 ), and lower than global average level (2.4hm^2 ) the result show that Tibet pasture ecological footprint is the most different with other area, and woodland is the second; Tibet ecological footprint grows from 1. 25 hm2 in 1978 to 2.09 hm^2 in 2002, which states that life level is improvingcontinuously; GDP (per RMB 104 Yuan) ecological footprint reduces from 61.9 hm2 in 1978 to 4.54 hm^2 in 2002, which states resources utilized ratio is increasing continuously.
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国 西藏 生态学足迹 生态多样性 生态运输能力 |
| 收稿时间： | 22 January 2005 |
Ecological carrying capacity of Tibet China |
| |
| LIUXiao-bao GAOJi-xi LoriAnnaConzo GAOMing-gang HEPing.Ecological carrying capacity of Tibet China[J].Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences,2005,10(4):647-652. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Xiao-bao Gao Ji-xi Lori Anna Conzo Gao Ming-gang He Ping |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Water Conservancy, 610041 Chengdu Sichuan, China;(2) Innovation Base of Regional Ecological Environment Protection, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, 100012 Beijing, China;(3) D'Appolonia S. p. A., 16145 Genova, Italy;(4) Weifang College, 261061 Weifang Shandong, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Ecological footprint's theory and method are used to calculate and analysis the ecological carrying capacity in Tibet. The
results indicate: Tibet ecological footprint (2. 1 hm2) keeps higher than countrywide average level (1. 5 hm2), and lower than global average level (2. 4 hm2); the result show that Tibet pasture ecological footprint is the most different with other area, and woodland is the second;
Tibet ecological footprint grows from 1. 25 hm2 in 1978 to 2. 09 hm2 in 2002, which states that life level is improving continuously; GDP (per RMB 104 Yuan) ecological footprint reduces from 61. 9 hm2 in 1978 to 4. 54 hm2 in 2002, which states resources utilized ratio is increasing continuously.
Foundation item: Supported by Key Project of SEPA and the Special Funds for Major State Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2003CB41500)
Biography: LIU Xiao-bao(1975-), Male, Ph. D candidate, research direction: ecological carrying capacity and moutain environment. |
| |
| Keywords: | ecological footprint ecotogically productive area ecological carrying capacity Tibet |
| 本文献已被 维普 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
