首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

唐以前的《史》《汉》比较研究综述
引用本文:沙志利.唐以前的《史》《汉》比较研究综述[J].泰山学院学报,2005,27(4):33-37.
作者姓名:沙志利
作者单位:北京大学,中文系,北京,100871
摘    要:唐以前的《史》《汉》比较大都就读书的直观印象肆意评论,往往牵连马班的为人,从评价者的主观爱憎出发,上下其手,一般没有客观且强有力的证据来辅佐论点,所以价值不大。但是由于这部分材料是《史》《汉》比较研究的基础,而且历来谈及这些材料的人不能正本清源,牵扯出很多问题。本文对此进行了辨析与考证。

关 键 词:《史》《汉》比较  唐代以前  综述
文章编号:1672-2590(2005)04-0033-05
收稿时间:2005-03-19
修稿时间:2005年3月19日

Review of the pre-Tang comparative study of Records of the Historian and Hanshu
SHA Zhi-li.Review of the pre-Tang comparative study of Records of the Historian and Hanshu[J].Journal of Taishan University,2005,27(4):33-37.
Authors:SHA Zhi-li
Institution:Department of Chinese, Beijing University, Beijing 100871, China
Abstract:are random comments on interpretations of the two books without objective and strong proof of their points and thus are of little value.However,these comments are the base for the comparative study of Records of the sistorian and Hanshu,and those who have always talked about the materials couldn't overhaul them,which has given rise to many problems.This paper differentiates,analysizes and criticizes the problems.
Keywords:comparative study of Records of the Historian and Hanshu  pre-Tang dynasties  review
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号