| 审美救赎论:从"人生的艺术化"到"审美化生存" |
| |
| 引用本文： | 叶世祥. 审美救赎论:从"人生的艺术化"到"审美化生存"[J]. 温州大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(3): 1-5 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 叶世祥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 温州师范学院人文学院,浙江,温州,325035 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在阐述审美救赎论时,不倚重被目前的学术界炒得很热的社会批判理论,把关注的重心投向被学界淡忘的朱光潜先生和宗白华先生的审美思想。与西方现代的学术思潮有着密切联系的朱光潜先生,其“人生艺术化”主张还是相当“古典”的,而学术取向颇具古典味的宗白华先生,其“审美化生存”思想则更具现代性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 审美救赎 朱光潜 宗白华 人生的艺术化 审美化生存 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-0375(2005)03-0001-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-03 |
Aesthetic Salvation: from "Classy Life" to "Classical Living" |
| |
| YE Shi-xiang. Aesthetic Salvation: from "Classy Life" to "Classical Living"[J]. Journal of Wenzhou University Natural Science, 2005, 26(3): 1-5 |
| |
| Authors: | YE Shi-xiang |
| |
| Abstract: | When interpreting the aesthetic Salvation, the author doesn't rely heavily on social criticism theory which becomesone hot topic in contemporary academia, but focuses on the aesthetic thoughts of Mr. Zhu Guangqian and Zong Baihua instead.Although Mr. Zhu Guangqian has a close relationship with modern Western thought, his "Classy Life" proposition is rather"classical". On the other hand, although Mr. Zong Baihua's academic approach is a little traditional, his "Classical Living" thoughtis quite modern. |
| |
| Keywords: | aesthetic salvation,Zhu Guangqian,Zong Baihua," Classy Life" ," Classical Living" |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
