| 满堂支架法与悬臂浇筑法设计方案比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄功伟,曹阳,陈锐.满堂支架法与悬臂浇筑法设计方案比较[J].中国西部科技,2012(12):4-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄功伟 曹阳 陈锐 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北省交通规划设计院,湖北武汉430000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文运用桥梁计算软件"桥梁博士"对既有设计桥梁方案选择进行进算与分析,从受力性能及工程造价等方面阐述悬臂浇筑施工法的优越性,对比分析满堂支架法在方案改选中存在的问题,对于桥梁设计具有借鉴意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 现浇连续箱梁 满堂支架施工 悬臂浇注法正截面应力 |
Comparison of the Design Proposals between the Full Space Supporting Method and the Cast-in-place Cantilever Method |
| |
| HUANG Gong-wei,CAO Yang,CHEN Rui.Comparison of the Design Proposals between the Full Space Supporting Method and the Cast-in-place Cantilever Method[J].Science and Technology of West China,2012(12):4-6. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Gong-wei CAO Yang CHEN Rui |
| |
| Institution: | (Hubei Communications Design Institute,Wuhan,Hubei 430000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | This thesis focused on calculating and analyzing the given bridge design proposals by using Doctor Bridge,a bridge calculation software. It presented the advantage of the cast-in-place cantilever method on the basis of mechanical properties and engineering cost, and it compared and analyzed problems during re-choosing the project via the full space supporting method.It could be very beneficial for bridge designing. |
| |
| Keywords: | Cast-in-place continuous box girder Full space supporting method Normal section capacity ofCast-in-cantilever method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
