| 《食品安全法》第96条之问题省思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汤勇,方印,王凯. 《食品安全法》第96条之问题省思[J]. 达县师范高等专科学校学报, 2009, 19(4): 37-40 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汤勇 方印 王凯 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 汤勇(四川文理学院,成教处,四川,达州,635000);方印(贵州大学,法学院,贵州,贵阳,550025);王凯(贵州师范大学,求是学院,贵州,贵阳,550001) |
| |
| 摘 要： | <食品安全法>第96条存在着惩罚性赔偿责任规定参照标准单一.惩罚性赔偿责任规定最高限额单一,民事赔偿优先实现的程序性规定缺失,食品召回不得免除民事责任规定缺失,食品虽符合国家标准但仍造成消费者人身、财产明显或严重损害这一意外损害赔偿责任规定缺失等问题.只有对这些问题进行反思、修改和完善,<食品安全法>中的民事责任制度的建构才会变得更加科学、合理与可行.
|
| 关 键 词： | 食品安全法 第96条 其他民事条款 问题 |
Reflections on Item 99 in the Foodstuff Safety Law |
| |
| TANG Yong,FANG Yin,WANG Kai. Reflections on Item 99 in the Foodstuff Safety Law[J]. Journal of Daxian Teachers College, 2009, 19(4): 37-40 |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Yong FANG Yin WANG Kai |
| |
| Affiliation: | TANG Yong1,FANG Yin2,WANG Kai3(1.Department of Adult Education,Sichuan University of Arts and Science,Dazhou 635000,China,2.College of Law,Guizhou University,Guiyang Guizhou 550025,3.College of Qiushi,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang Guizhou 550001,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper pointed out the problems which are shown in Item 99 of the Foodstuff Safety Law such as the very simple standard for reference in compensation obligation for punishment,the top limitation of compensation obligation for punishment,lack of civil compensation priority,civil regulation cannot be exempt after food returning,compensation should be done for damages to consumers or property though foodstuff accords with the national standards concerned.Reflections and revisions on the problems would help... |
| |
| Keywords: | Foodstuff Safety Law Item 99 other civil clauses problem |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
