首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不一样的正义:英国大法官与罗马裁判官衡平司法的路径比较
引用本文:冷霞.不一样的正义:英国大法官与罗马裁判官衡平司法的路径比较[J].枣庄师专学报,2013(4):127-130.
作者姓名:冷霞
作者单位:华东政法大学外国法与比较法研究院,上海200042
基金项目:本文是国家社会科学基金重大项目"法律文明史"(11&ad081)子课题"英美法系",教育部人文社科研究项目青年课题"中世纪英格兰中书法庭司法转型研究"(10YJC820055)、上海市教委晨光项目"英国大法官研究"之阶段性成果.
摘    要:作为各自衡平法的源头,英国大法官与古罗马裁判官衡平司法存在诸多相似之处,但两者也存在运作路径上的巨大差异,具体表现在两者的法院体系、创造衡平法的方式、发展衡平法的理论基础以及具体衡平制度等方面。这些差异表明英国衡平法主要是英国法律本土发展的产物,而非大量借鉴罗马法的结果。

关 键 词:英国大法官  罗马裁判官  衡平司法  衡平法

Different Justice: On the Equitable Justice between English Chancellor and Roman Praector
LENG Xia.Different Justice: On the Equitable Justice between English Chancellor and Roman Praector[J].Journal of Zaozhuang Teachers' College,2013(4):127-130.
Authors:LENG Xia
Institution:LENG Xia (East China University of Politics and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)
Abstract:As origins of respective equity, the equitable justice of english chancellor resembles that of roman praector in many aspects. But there are still many huge differences, such as the court systems as the organization basis of equitable justice, the ways of administrating equity, principles of developing equity and concrete equitable rules. These differences prove that english equity is mainly indigenous to english law, and isnt outcome of borrowing from roman law.
Keywords:english chancellor  roman praector  equitable justice  equity
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号