| 检测血清血管紧张素转换酶的方法比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘华欣,曹丽春,张小刚,王承志,李咏梅,杜培革.检测血清血管紧张素转换酶的方法比较研究[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),1999(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘华欣 曹丽春 张小刚 王承志 李咏梅 杜培革 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 空军医学高等专科学校!吉林132013(刘华欣，曹丽春，王承志)，吉林医学院(张小刚，李咏梅，杜培革) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：研究比较两种检测血清ACE的实验方法。方法：对同一血清同时采用酶动力学法与Neels方法进行相关对比。结果：酶动力学法CV：批内37％，批间46％，而对比的Neels方法CV：批内4.0％，批间4．9％。相关系数r＝0.981，回归方程Y＝1．21X＋58。结论：认为酶动力学方法具有简便快捷，重复性好，无需特殊仪器，试剂适于一般临床实验室中广泛开展。
|
| 关 键 词： | 血管紧张素转换酶 酶动力学法 γ-谷氨酰基转移酶 |
Tht comparison of determination of angiotensin- converting enzyme in serum |
| |
| Liu HuaXin, Chao LiChun, Wang Chengzhi.Tht comparison of determination of angiotensin- converting enzyme in serum[J].Journal of Beihua University(Natural Science),1999(1). |
| |
| Authors: | Liu HuaXin Chao LiChun Wang Chengzhi |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective: To study and compare two measuring methed of serum ACE. Methods: Using kinetic enzymatic method and Neels method respectively, we measured and compared ACE activity in same serum at the same time. Result:The within -run and between - run CV of kinetic enzymatic method were 3 .7% and 4.6% respectively, and the another within- run and between - run CV were 4 .0% and 4 .9% respectively. r = 0 .981, Y = 1 .21X 58. Conclusion: The kinetic enzymatic method is simple and quick. and it can be used widely for general medical laboratory. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
