从解构主义角度看不可通约性

解构主义者力挺发端于古代的怀疑论、近代的二元论和当代科学哲学中普遍流行的不可通约论;认为一切理论话语都是人为地使其具有某种结构、意义和本质,并不能完善地再现和把握现实,以至他们试图消解这样的本质结构;确信语言不是描述现实和经验的手段,只是从能指到能指的游戏。现实中没有什么东西能够充分存在于概念中,以至我们既不能把自己所说写的东西呈现给别人,甚至也不能呈现给自己,因为我们反观内心时,仍需使用远离指谓对象的语言符号。为此德里达等人主张:一切文本都只具有意向性、互涉性和主观创造的意义。人们不仅对不同的理论很难进行通约,就是针对同一理论也很难进行比对。

To Look Incommensurability from Deconstructionist Angle

Deconstructionists effectively support and extend the incommensurability originated in ancient skepticism,modern dualism and became widely prevalent in contemporary,think that all theories and words are artificially making them possessing some structure and nature,and can not to reappear and grasp the reality.So they try to eliminate such essence and structure,believe that language is not the means of describing reality and internal experience,is only the game from signifer to signifier.Nothing can exist fully within concepts.Therefore,we can neither to present the own saying and writing to others,nor even present them to own,because we counter-argument in inside,still need to use the language and symbol away from the real and reference object.For this reason,J.Derrida and so on proposal that all texts only have the meaning of the intention,mutuality and subjective creation.People not only are difficult to compare and communicate the different theory,but are difficult to compare and communicate the same theory or concept.