| 多目标决策中定性指标的评价方法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张明善 唐小我 等. 多目标决策中定性指标的评价方法[J]. 西南民族学院学报(自然科学版), 2001, 27(4): 392-394,401 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张明善 唐小我 等 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]西南民族学院经济管理学院，成都610041 [2]电子科技大学，成都610054 |
| |
| 基金项目： | Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China( 70102008 ) ;Supported by Sichuan Youth Foundation of Science andTechnology. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 多决策中的定性指标通常可以数学方法和数学模型来用评价和测定，但由于评价指标的模糊性，所获得的评价结果有时可能是不准确的。于是如何提高评价结果的精确度，便是多目标决策理论中研究的一个重要课题。本文对此进行了探讨，应用集值统计原理，获得了4个在不同情形下可以使用的评价方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 多目标决策 定性指标 评价方法 集值统计原理 数学模型 模糊性 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-2843(2001)04-0392-03 |
Evaluation Methods of Qualitative Indices in Multi-objective Decision |
| |
| ZHANG Ming shan ,TANG Xiao wo ,HE De quan. Evaluation Methods of Qualitative Indices in Multi-objective Decision[J]. Journal of Southwest Nationalities College(Natural Science Edition), 2001, 27(4): 392-394,401 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Ming shan TANG Xiao wo HE De quan |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Ming shan 1,TANG Xiao wo 2,HE De quan 3 |
| |
| Abstract: | Qualitative indices in multi objective decision can ordinarily be evaluated and measured by mathematical methods or models, but obtained results are likely sometimes inaccurate because of fuzziness of indices. To improve the accuracy of evaluation results, Set value Statistic Principle is applied, and so four evaluation methods are obtained in this paper. Meanwhile, these methods are compared briefly. |
| |
| Keywords: | multi objective decision qualitative index evaluation method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
