回收处理基金下闭环供应链的多元化主导模式

从2011年起,中国政府出台了一系列关于废弃电器电子产品回收处理的政策法规,对中国闭环供应链的理论和实践都提出了新的挑战.本文首先分析了新政策下电器电子产品闭环供应链结构的重组,并对其运行模式的修正进行研究.然后,对由于结构重组形成的四种主导模式进行建模分析,求解给出每种模式的决策最优解.最后,对这四种模式的最优决策进行比较分析,研究发现:1)在四种主导模式下,为了保证产品的销量,制造企业和零售企业都没有调整产品销售价格的动机;制造企业和零售企业权力的差异体现在产品批发价格的差异上. 2)闭环供应链各成员的主导权力和他们之间利润息息相关,成员企业的渠道权力越大,相应的利润就越高.但是,销售企业的利润不受逆向渠道主导模式的影响,拆解企业的利润不受正向渠道主导模式的影响,逆向渠道的市场回收价格和转移价格不受正向渠道主导模式的影响.3)制造企业受处理基金的影响是正负双向的.文章的研究结论具有一定的现实指导价值,有利于基金政策在中国的实施和完善.

Diversified dominant modes of closed-loop supply chain under the recycling fund

Since 2011, the Chinese government has issued a series of fund policies (The Fund Policy) on recycling and disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). This has had a great impact on the Chinese closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), causing structure reorganization. We study this structure reorganization and the dominant modes of CLSC. There are four dominant modes formed by The Fund Policy's impact, are studied in this paper. And the optimal decisions of the four dominant modes are compared analysis. This study found the following:1) In the four dominant modes, manufacturers and retailers are not motivated to adjust the selling price of products; the differences between the manufacturers and the retailers' bargaining power is reflected in the wholesale price. 2) The dominant power of each member of the CLSC is closely related to the profit of the members, which means whichever member holds the greater portion of the channel power, the higher their profits are. However, the profit of the sellers is not affected by the reverse channel dominant mode, the profit of the dismantling enterprise is not affected by the forward channel of the dominant mode, and both the recycling and transfer prices are not affected by the forward channel of the dominant mode. 3) The effect of Chinese Disposal Fund to the manufacturers could be either positive or negative. The research conclusion has the certain reality instruction value, and beneficial to implement and perfect The Chinese Fund Policy.