首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

龚建平"黑哨"案一审判决定罪问题评析
引用本文:李诚顺.龚建平"黑哨"案一审判决定罪问题评析[J].潍坊学院学报,2003,3(3):35-37.
作者姓名:李诚顺
作者单位:潍坊学院,山东,潍坊,261061
摘    要:“黑哨”行为本质上是一种利用公共权力,损害国家、社会公共利益以及足球俱乐部和广大足球观众利益的行为,根据我国刑法第九十三条第二款关于“其他依照法律从事公务的人员”的规定,我国足球职业联赛中的裁判可以以准国家工作人员论。“黑哨”行为符合受贿罪的犯罪主体特征,应以受贿罪定罪处罚。

关 键 词:龚建平  “黑哨”行为  公共权力  刑法  足球职业联赛  受贿罪  犯罪主体  定罪问题
文章编号:1671-4288(2003)03-0035-03
修稿时间:2003年3月16日

An Analysis on the Condemnation Problem of the Judgment of the First Trial of Gong Jianping's "Sinister Whistle" Case
LI Cheng-shun.An Analysis on the Condemnation Problem of the Judgment of the First Trial of Gong Jianping's "Sinister Whistle" Case[J].Journal of Weifang University,2003,3(3):35-37.
Authors:LI Cheng-shun
Abstract:Sinister Whistle" act endanger national and social public interest, soccer club and soccer audiences' interest in the essence by utilizing public power. According to the regulations of the second section of Article 93 of Criminal Law on "Others who exercising a public function concerning laws", judges of Chinese Soccer Professional League Matches may be treated as quasi-state personnel. "Sinister Whistle" act fits the features of criminal subject of acceptance of bribes and should be punished as acceptance of bribes.
Keywords:Sinister Whistle"  Quasi-State personnel  acceptance of Bribes
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号