| 无砂砼小桩处理软土和黄土高填方路基的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭院成,刘海涛,张浩华. 无砂砼小桩处理软土和黄土高填方路基的对比分析[J]. 河南科学, 2003, 21(5): 524-527 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭院成 刘海涛 张浩华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 郑州大学土木工程学院,河南,郑州,450002
2. 郑州市市政工程管理处,河南,郑州,450002 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 河南省科技攻关资助项目(0224620011) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 根据高填方路基的工程特点及无砂砼小桩复合地基技术特点,研究分析了软土高填方路基处理过程中,下部软弱土层中孔隙水压力和有效应力的变化规律,以及黄土地区高填方路基处理过程中的内力和变形特点,采用应力路径法对比研究了软土路基和黄土路基采用无砂砼小桩处理时的优化设计问题,可供同类工程参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 软土 黄土 高填方路基 有效应力 应力路径 优化设计 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-3918(2003)05-0524-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-04-01 |
Comparison on thick-fill highway foundation over weak soil and collapsible loess processed by Non-Sand-Mini-Pile(NSMP) |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the analysis of features of thick fill highway foundation and the characteristics of Non Sand Mini Pile(NSMP) composite foundation, the evolution procedure of pore water pressure and effective stress in bed weak soil in the course of foundation processing are studied in detail. Meanwhile, the same items in collapsible loess foundation are determined. The stress path method is applied in the comparison study on weak soil and collapsible loess foundation. In addition, the optimization design solution is suggested. The conclusion may be used as the reference for the similar projects. |
| |
| Keywords: | weak soil collapsible loess thick-fill highway foundation effective stress stress path optimum design |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
