| 文杏牡丹自不同——论二晏词之异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐红卫. 文杏牡丹自不同——论二晏词之异[J]. 大庆师范学院学报, 2010, 30(1): 87-90 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐红卫 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 石河子大学文学艺术学院,新疆石河子,832003 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 二晏父子迥然不同的个性和遭遇导致他们词作中抒发的情感大相径庭。从二晏词作的字、句、篇三方面均可以看出,作为理性的诗人和人生的幸运儿,晏殊抒发的常常是带有人类普遍规律的闲愁;作为纯情的词人和人生的失败者,晏几道抒发的常常是一种不能自已的哀愁。
|
| 关 键 词： | 晏词 晏殊 晏几道 词作 |
Difference of Apricot and Peony--Differences between Yan Shu and Yan Jidao's Ci |
| |
| TANG Hong-wei. Difference of Apricot and Peony--Differences between Yan Shu and Yan Jidao's Ci[J]. Journal of Daqing Normal University, 2010, 30(1): 87-90 |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Hong-wei |
| |
| Affiliation: | School of literature and art;ShiHezi University;XinJiang 832003 China |
| |
| Abstract: | Different personality and experiences made Yan Shu and Yan Jidao different in expressing feelings in their Ci. Yan Shu often expressed his worry idly as a rationalist due to his lucky life experience; while Yan Jidao expressed his sorrowful feelings because of his failure experiences. |
| |
| Keywords: | Yan Shu Yan Jidao Ci |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
