首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

灾后重建中的资金来源及有效性对比研究———以美国绿堡镇与中国汶川灾区南坝镇为例
引用本文:石蜜蜜,杨赛霓,贺帅,杜娟,孙小华.灾后重建中的资金来源及有效性对比研究———以美国绿堡镇与中国汶川灾区南坝镇为例[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,51(2):160-163.
作者姓名:石蜜蜜  杨赛霓  贺帅  杜娟  孙小华
作者单位:北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京师范大学民政部/教育部减灾与应急管理研究院,100875,北京
基金项目:科技部国际合作项目,国家重点基础研究发展计划资助项目
摘    要:以美国堪萨斯州绿堡镇龙卷风灾区和中国汶川地震灾区灾后重建工作为例,选择具有代表性的两个研究区——美国堪萨斯州绿堡镇和四川省平武县南坝镇为研究区,从宏观和微观角度出发,采用文献研究、问卷调查和数据统计分析的方法,对比分析二者在资金来源及使用成效在当地灾民认知方面的异同,并分析差异形成的可能原因,以期为中国灾后恢复重建工作的顺利展开提供借鉴和理论指导.

关 键 词:灾后重建    绿堡    汶川    对比研究

A comparative study on sources and effectiveness of funding in post-disaster recovery:case study of Greensburg and Nanba Town in Wenchuan
SHI Mimi,YANG Saini,HE Shuai,DU Juan,SUN Xiaohua.A comparative study on sources and effectiveness of funding in post-disaster recovery:case study of Greensburg and Nanba Town in Wenchuan[J].Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science),2015,51(2):160-163.
Authors:SHI Mimi  YANG Saini  HE Shuai  DU Juan  SUN Xiaohua
Institution:SHI Mimi;YANG Saini;HE Shuai;DU Juan;SUN Xiaohua;State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management of Ministry of Civil Affairs & Ministry of Education,Beijing Normal University;
Abstract:Two representative towns,Greensburg in Kansas (US)and Nanba in Pingwu (China),were used to showcase the comparative study of post-disaster recovery. Literature studies, field surveys and statistical analyses were used to compare funding sources and effectiveness of fund use in victim perception macroscopically and microscopically. Potential reasons leading to differences were analyzed, to provide guidance for post-disaster recovery practice in China.
Keywords:post-disaster recovery  Greensburg  Wenchuan  comparison study
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号