Saving the Strong Programme? A critique of David Bloor’s recent work |
| |
Authors: | Stephen Kemp |
| |
Institution: | Sociology, School of Social and Political Studies, Adam Ferguson Building, George Square, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9LL, UK |
| |
Abstract: | This article critically appraises David Bloor’s recent attempts to refute criticisms levelled at the Strong Programme’s social constructionist approach to scientific knowledge. Bloor has tried to argue, contrary to some critics, that the Strong Programme is not idealist in character, and it does not involve a challenge to the credibility of scientific knowledge. I argue that Bloor’s attempt to deflect the charge of idealism, which calls on the self-referential theory of social institutions, is partially successful. However, I suggest that although the Strong Programme should not be accused of ‘strong idealism’, it is still vulnerable to the criticism that it entails a form of ‘weak idealism’. The article moves on to argue that, contrary to Bloor, constructionist approaches do challenge the credibility of the scientific knowledge that they analyse. I conclude the article by arguing that sociological analyses of scientific knowledge can be conducted without the weak idealism and the credibility-challenging assumptions of the Strong Programme approach. |
| |
Keywords: | Strong Programme David Bloor Social constructionism Idealism Self-reference Scientific credibility |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|