辩者论题的科学思想与反向思维

对《庄子·天下》中所载先秦名家辩者的一些论题大都是诡辩的说法，从科技史和思维学的角度作了重新探讨。认为除一两条外，则都不是诡辩，其中蕴藏着深邃的科学思想，并有一条超越常规的思路。这条思路不同于一般循规蹈矩的正常思维，带有“智力叛逆”的性质，是一种反向思维，也可以说是更高层次的智慧。

The Scientific Ideas and Anti-thinking of the Arguers Proposition

In " Zhuang Zi"there are some ideas of the famous arguers in the pre-Chin historic time. Inthe past ,all of those ideas were considered as sophistry.yet they are discussed in a new light of scienceand thinking and most of them are regarded not to be sophistry with one or two exceptions only. Theyare scientifically profound and an unusual way of thinking goes through them,Different from the com-mon way ,their way of thinking is an anti-thinking method ,characterized by its intellingence reversion,so,can be regarded as a kind of wisdom of a higher lever.