首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于HPSO算法和GA的舰载机甲板布放方法比较
引用本文:司维超,韩维,史玮韦. 基于HPSO算法和GA的舰载机甲板布放方法比较[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2013, 35(2): 338-344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2013.02.17
作者姓名:司维超  韩维  史玮韦
作者单位:1. 海军航空工程学院研究生管理大队, 山东 烟台 264001;2. 海军航空工程学院飞行器工程系, 山东 烟台 264001
基金项目:中国博士后科学基金(201003758)资助课题
摘    要:以戴高乐航母为研究对象,基于不同优化算法,对其舰面舰载机布放问题的解决方法进行比较,以此作为解决其他类型航母同样问题的参考。首先,分析了解决舰载机舰面布放调度问题的先决条件,包括舰面战位的设置;各战位间距离的测量计算;舰载机正常的出动流程分析;舰载机出动时间计算公式的设计。其次,将舰载机舰面布放调度问题转换为带有约束条件的多目标函数求最小解问题,并给出了数学模型。再次,给出了利用改进的粒子群优化 (honeybee particle swarm optimization,HPSO)算法和遗传算法(genetic algorithm,GA)对问题求解的解决思路。最后,对两种算法50次独立运算的结果,分别从平均最短出动时间、平均最短移动距离、标准偏差以及算法的收敛性和精确性等方面进行比较。结果表明,HPSO算法较GA更适合于解决该布放问题。

关 键 词:甲板布放  改进的粒子群优化算法  遗传算法

Comparison of deck-disposed methods for shipboard aircraft based on HPSO and GA
SI Wei-chao,HAN Wei,SHI Wei-wei. Comparison of deck-disposed methods for shipboard aircraft based on HPSO and GA[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(2): 338-344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2013.02.17
Authors:SI Wei-chao  HAN Wei  SHI Wei-wei
Affiliation:1. Graduate Student’s Brigade, Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, Yantai 264001, China;;2. Department of Airborne Vehicle Engineering, Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, Yantai 264001,China
Abstract:The deck-disposed scheduling methods of carrier planes about De Gaulle are researched based on different optimization algorithms, which can be used to solve the same questions of another aircraft carrier. First, the basic conditions of deck-disposed scheduling problem of carrier planes are analysed, which includes battle position setting, distance measurement between gate position and preparative position, natural takeoff flow analysis, takeoff time expressions about different numbers of carrier planes. Second, the deck-disposed scheduling question is changed into a multiobjective functions with restriction which needs to figure out the minimum solution, then the mathematical model is proposed. Third, the honeybee particle swarm optimization (HPSO) and genetic algorithm (GA) are used to solve the problem separately. In the end, the average shortest takeoff time, average shortest moving distance, standard deviation and the astringency and accuracy of algorithms about fifty separate operations are compared. The result shows that HPSO is fitter than GA for solving the problem.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《系统工程与电子技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《系统工程与电子技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号