Rip it up and start again: The rejection of a characterization of a phenomenon |
| |
Authors: | David Colaço |
| |
Institution: | 1. Educational Psychology, University of Trier, Germany;2. Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID), Trier, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | In this paper, I investigate the nature of empirical findings that provide evidence for the characterization of a scientific phenomenon, and the defeasible nature of this evidence. To do so, I explore an exemplary instance of the rejection of a characterization of a scientific phenomenon: memory transfer. I examine the reason why the characterization of memory transfer was rejected, and analyze how this rejection tied to researchers’ failures to resolve experimental issues relating to replication and confounds. I criticize the presentation of the case by Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, who claim that no sufficient reason was provided to abandon research on memory transfer. I argue that skeptics about memory transfer adopted what I call a defeater strategy, in which researchers exploit the defeasibility of the evidence for a characterization of a phenomenon. |
| |
Keywords: | Scientific phenomenon Evidence Defeasibility Memory transfer |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|