How to think about shared norms and pluralism without circularity: A reply to Anna Leuschner |
| |
Authors: | Jaana Eigi |
| |
Institution: | 1. Institute of Physics AS CR, Cukrovarnicka 10, 16200, Prague, Czech Republic;2. Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411, Tartu, Estonia;3. Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Ke Karlovu 5, 12116, Prague, Czech Republic |
| |
Abstract: | Anna Leuschner argues that there is problematic circularity in Helen Longino's approach that postulates the existence of some shared norms as a necessary precondition for well-functioning pluralistic communities. As an alternative, Leuschner proposes to approach the establishing of more pluralistic communities through political means on a case-by-case basis, taking relevant epistemic and political factors into account. In this paper, I argue that there is an alternative understanding of norms that avoids circularity. I do so by drawing on Isabelle Peschard's discussion of shared practice. I go on to show that norms, so understood, are important in the cases where a political decision may not alone be sufficient for establishing a successful community. Specifically, I discuss pluralistic communities that include laypersons in possession of relevant expertise as an example. |
| |
Keywords: | Objectivity Pluralism Norms Lay expertise Longino |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|