代位权制度之反思与出路——兼论与仲裁协议的弥合

债权人代位权制度是传统民法学上一项重要制度，而在我国正式确立不过寥寥十多年。代位权的本质在于债的保全，基于此赋予它对债的相对性的突破，牵涉进第三人的利益，故应用须谨慎细致。与传统民法学上的代位权制度相比，我国的代位权制度可谓是“亮点”纷呈，十分具有中国特色，是好还是坏，是现实的束缚还是理论的禁锢。综观世界法史，从应然角度看，代位权制度本身应扩大适用范围，如囊括保存行为等，以满足现实的需求。从代位权制度的背景、现状、客体、行使后果、实践中有关管辖、仲裁的争议出发，认真梳理代位权的细节，从多角度进行考察，旨在为实务困惑提供一些解决路径，同时对发展前景进行一定探讨。

Reflection and Solution of Subrogation Right System and It’s Integration with the Arbitration Agreement

The subrogation right in traditional civil law is very important. It has been established only for 10 years in China. The nature of subrogation is preserving debt which broke through the relativity principle of credit since it’s always involved with a third party. Compared with the traditional civil law, subrogation right in China is different. Reviewing the world history , the subrogation right should have expanded the scope of application, such as preservation behavior to meet the demand of reality. Starting from the background, present situation, object, consequences, disputes of the right of subrogation in the practice regarding jurisdiction and arbitration, this article studied the details, investigated many angles to provide some solutions to problems in practice.