首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

干法脱硫剂的优选及在地下储气库的应用
引用本文:王京博. 干法脱硫剂的优选及在地下储气库的应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(3): 119-122. DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.03.031
作者姓名:王京博
作者单位:辽河油田公司勘探开发研究院试验技术研究所,辽宁 盘锦 124010
摘    要:通过实验研究了几种氧化铁型脱硫剂和活性炭脱硫剂的工作特性及各种工艺参数对其穿透硫容的影响。以实验结果为基础,对这两种干法脱硫剂进行了比选。结果表明,氧化铁脱硫剂以EF-2为最佳,活性炭脱硫剂以3018为最佳;评价认为3018具有较高的脱硫效率和安全性,更加适合现场应用。在此基础上,研究了3018浸渍改性活性炭脱硫剂的影响因素,并在大庆油田喇嘛甸储气库进行了应用。应用表明,3018改性活性炭脱硫剂效果较好,天然气净化后H2S含量低于国家标准。

关 键 词:氧化铁  脱硫剂  活性炭  浸渍剂  硫容  
收稿时间:2007-05-24

OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATION OF DRY METHOD DESULFURIZER IN UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS STORAGE
WANG Jing-bo. OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATION OF DRY METHOD DESULFURIZER IN UNDERGROUND NATURAL GAS STORAGE[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Seience & Technology Edition), 2008, 30(3): 119-122. DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.03.031
Authors:WANG Jing-bo
Affiliation:Institute of Petroleum Exploration and development,Liaohe Oilfield Company,PetroChina,Panjin Liaoning 124010,China
Abstract:The characteristics of ferric oxide desulphurizer and active carbon desulphurizer and effects of various processing parameters on break through sulfur capacity are studied through experiment.The two kinds of desulphurizers are compared based on the experimental data.Experimental results indicate that EF-2 of ferric oxide desulphurizer and 3018 of carbon desulphurizer are better.3018 carbon desulphurizer is of better desulfurizing efficiency and safety,it is more suitable to be applied in field.Influencing factors of 3018 dipping modified active carbon desulphurizer is studied and was applied in Lamadian underground natural gas storage,Daqing Oilfield.The application shows that 3018 modified active carbon desulphurizer can clean content of H2S below national standard.
Keywords:ferric oxide  desulphurizer  active carbon  additive  breakthrough sulfur capacity  
点击此处可从《西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号