首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

红树林沉积物中痕量多氯联苯的分析方法
引用本文:陈耿,伍卡兰,黄雄飞,李旭林,陈桂珠.红树林沉积物中痕量多氯联苯的分析方法[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2009,48(3).
作者姓名:陈耿  伍卡兰  黄雄飞  李旭林  陈桂珠
作者单位:1. 中山大学环境科学与工程学院,广东,广州,510275;广东省环境污染控制与修复技术重点实验室,广东,广州,510275;中山大学湿地研究中心,广东,广州,510275
2. 中山大学环境科学与工程学院,广东,广州,510275;广东省环境污染控制与修复技术重点实验室,广东,广州,510275
基金项目:国家自然科学基金,教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金 
摘    要: 多氯联苯(PCBs)对红树林生态系统存在着一定的生态风险,对红树林沉积物中PCBs的监测有重要意义。报道了一种适用于红树 林沉积物样品痕量PCBs的分析方法,并对其质量保证与质量控制(QA/QC)进行了研究。分别采用超声萃取(USE)和微波辅助萃 取(MAE)对沉积物样品进行提取,针对样品的特点,联合运用铜片超声、酸洗和中性氧化铝—改性硅胶复合层析柱对PCBs纯化 分离,以气相色谱—质谱联用仪(GC/MS)和外标法进行定量。实验结果表明,两种萃取方法与GC/MS联用均有较高的回收率,超 声萃取的回收率为47.45%~100.76%,微波辅助萃取的回收率为77.04%~98.00%,但微波辅助萃取的精确度更高;方法检测限 前者为0.30~1.74 ng/g,后者为0.30~0.47 ng/g。故选用微波辅助萃取—GC/MS联用的分析方法更优。

关 键 词:多氯联苯  红树林沉积物  超声萃取  微波辅助萃取  GC/MS  质量保证/质量控制
收稿时间:2008-07-16;

Determination of Trace PCBs in Mangrove Sediments
CHEN Geng,WU Kalan,HUANG Xiongfei,LI Xulin,CHEN Guizhu.Determination of Trace PCBs in Mangrove Sediments[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,2009,48(3).
Authors:CHEN Geng  WU Kalan  HUANG Xiongfei  LI Xulin  CHEN Guizhu
Institution:(1.School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat sen University, Guangzhou 510275;2.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology,Guangzhou 510275;3.Wetland Research Center, Sun Yat sen University, Guangzhou 510275,China)
Abstract:As polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in mangrove ecosystem may cause ecological risk, monitoring of PCBs in sediments is of great importance. This work presents the determination of trace PCBs in mangrove sediment samples, under the condition of quality assurance/quality control(QA/QC). In this study, both ultrasonic extraction(USE) and microwave assisted extraction(MAE) are tried.According to properties of the samples, PCBs are cleaned up with copper, sulfuric acid and alumina-silica chromatography column. Then,PCBs are detected by the apparatus of GC/MS. The results show that both USE and MAE have high recoveries. The recoveries of the whole analysis range from 47.45% to 100.76% by USE and from 77.04% to 98.00% by MAE, respectively,and MAE has higher accuracy The method detection limits for PCBs range from 0.30 to 1.74 ng/g by USE and from 0.30 to 0.47 ng/g by MAE. So MAE is a better choice.
Keywords:GC/MS
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中山大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中山大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号