| 两种不同的水环境质量评价方法应用与比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 虞登梅. 两种不同的水环境质量评价方法应用与比较[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 26(1): 6-9 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 虞登梅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽理工大学资源与环境工程系,安徽,淮南,232001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 安徽理工大学校科研和教改项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了获得地下水质量的准确结果,采用多种方法进行综合评价会收到良好的效果.分别采用综合指数法和模糊综合评判法对刘庄和板集勘探区的浅层地下水水环境质量进行了评价,结果表明,模糊综合评判法对地下水环境质量评价具有较好的针对性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 水环境质量 地下水 评价方法 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-1098(2006)01-0006-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-08-01 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-08-01 |
The Application and Comparison of the Two Valuating Methods of Groundwater Environment |
| |
| YU Deng-mei. The Application and Comparison of the Two Valuating Methods of Groundwater Environment[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Natural Science, 2006, 26(1): 6-9 |
| |
| Authors: | YU Deng-mei |
| |
| Affiliation: | Dept. of Resources and Environment Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China |
| |
| Abstract: | To get a precise result of groundwater environment quality, the application of multiple method is effective. The exponent valuing method and fuzzy comprehensive judgment method in the article are used to value the quality of shallow groundwater in Liuzhuang and Banji exploration area. The valuing results indicate the fuzzy comprehensive judgment method has good pertinence in evaluating the groundwater environment quality. |
| |
| Keywords: | water environment quality j groundwater valuing methods |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
