首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

食品侵权责任惩罚性赔偿制度修改建议
引用本文:刘道远,崔蒙蒙. 食品侵权责任惩罚性赔偿制度修改建议[J]. 北京工商大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 31(4): 69-73
作者姓名:刘道远  崔蒙蒙
作者单位:北京工商大学法学院,北京100048
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(10YJC820072); 国家社会科学基金资助项目(12BFX079)
摘    要:2009年中国首部《食品安全法》的出台将我国食品从"卫生"标准上升到"安全"标准的高度,确立了较完善的制度体系,其中的惩罚性赔偿无疑是这部法律中较为成功的制度设计.指出《食品安全法》中的惩罚性赔偿制度的立法尚存在一些问题,导致实践中出现困境.提出《食品安全法》的修改,应科学确定惩罚性赔偿范围标准,设定赔偿数额的浮动限额,规定最低赔偿数额,注意制度之间的衔接,从而在立法上保证其在制度体系上的科学性和合理性,实践上保证其功能能够得以发挥.

关 键 词:食品安全  侵权责任  惩罚性赔偿

Amendment Proposals about Food Tort Liability Punitive Damages System
LIU Dao-yuan and CUI Meng-meng. Amendment Proposals about Food Tort Liability Punitive Damages System[J]. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University:Natural Science Edition, 2013, 31(4): 69-73
Authors:LIU Dao-yuan and CUI Meng-meng
Affiliation:( School of Law, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)
Abstract:The China's first "food safety law" was released in 2009, which improved our country's food standard from "health" to "safety" and established the scientific legal system. It is no doubt that the part of punitive damages is the more successful system design in the law. However, the system of punitive damages in the food safety legislation still has some problems, leading to difficulties in practice. In the new revision of "food safety law" , the scope Of punitive damages should be scientifically determined and the amount of compensation of floating limits should be set . Moreover, the minimum amount of compensation should be determined and attentions should be paid to the cohesion between systems. The solutions of these problems can guarantee its scientificity and rationality in the legislation and its function in practice.
Keywords:food safety  tort liability  punitive damages
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京工商大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京工商大学学报(自然科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号