首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

电势法和磁场法在直流电弧炉电弧射流数值模拟中的对比
引用本文:王丰华,金之俭,朱子述. 电势法和磁场法在直流电弧炉电弧射流数值模拟中的对比[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2006, 40(4): 577-582,592
作者姓名:王丰华  金之俭  朱子述
作者单位:上海交通大学,电气工程系,上海,200240;上海交通大学,电气工程系,上海,200240;上海交通大学,电气工程系,上海,200240
摘    要:针对直流电弧炉冶炼过程,在二维近似条件下,利用PHOENICS程序对直流电弧炉内电弧射流的磁流体力学模型进行了数值模拟,分析了电势法和磁场法在电弧射流数值模拟研究中的异同,并将这两种方法的计算结果与已有的实验结果进行了比较.结果表明,磁场法的计算结果高于电势法且与实验结果更加接近;但从数值模拟的角度看,电势法更易实现.

关 键 词:直流电弧炉  数值模拟  电弧射流  电势法  磁场法
文章编号:1006-2467(2006)04-0577-06
收稿时间:2005-05-17
修稿时间:2005-05-17

A Comparison of Arc Plasma Numerical Simulation between Potential Approach and Magnetic Approach in DC Electric Arc Furnace
WANG Feng-hua,JIN Zhi-jian,ZHU Zi-shu. A Comparison of Arc Plasma Numerical Simulation between Potential Approach and Magnetic Approach in DC Electric Arc Furnace[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2006, 40(4): 577-582,592
Authors:WANG Feng-hua  JIN Zhi-jian  ZHU Zi-shu
Affiliation:Dept. of Electrical Eng. , Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. , Shanghai 200240, China
Abstract:A two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic model which is used to describe the arc plasma of DC electric arc furnace was presented and solved by PHOENICS software. A comparison of arc plasma numerical simulation was made between potential approach and magnetic approach. Calculated results were compared with the experimental measurements reported in other article, it is showed that the calculated results of magnetic approach are higher than that of potential approach and agree better with the measured results. However, potential approach is a more convenient and numerically better-behaved method to represent the arc plasma from the numerical simulation point of view.
Keywords:dc electric arc furnace   numerical simulation   arc plasma   potential approach   magnetic approach
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号