首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

随钻与电缆脉冲中子孔隙度测井响应差异研究
引用本文:袁超,刘翰林,张锋,袁悦,刘军涛. 随钻与电缆脉冲中子孔隙度测井响应差异研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(2): 79. DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.01.13.08
作者姓名:袁超  刘翰林  张锋  袁悦  刘军涛
作者单位:1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院测井与遥感技术研究所,北京海淀100083;2. 西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院,陕西西安710065;3. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院,山东青岛266580;4. 中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司研究院,上海徐汇200335
基金项目:国家重大油气专项(2011ZX0520 008,2011ZX05020 002);国家自然科学基金(41374125)。
摘    要:由于地层模型和测量条件不同,随钻和电缆脉冲中子孔隙度测井响应存在差异,对其响应差异研究可为随钻测井解释提供理论依据。利用蒙特卡罗方法建立不同地层模型,模拟不同测井环境条件下响应的差异。结果表明,在随钻测井条件下,热中子计数比值随地层孔隙度增加按三次多项式趋势增加,电缆脉冲中子孔隙度测井响应也具有相同的规律,但随钻和电缆脉冲中子孔隙度测井响应曲线存在交叉点;随钻测井条件下孔隙度相对灵敏度计算值大于电缆测井,但随钻测井条件下的钻铤会降低热中子计数统计性,影响孔隙度测量精度;不同测井环境条件对由于其改变引起的随钻和电缆测井响应差异影响随地层孔隙度增加而减小,岩性、泥质含量和井眼尺寸对随钻测井响应的影响都大于电缆测井,井眼流体为淡水、油或盐水时对脉冲中子孔隙度响应影响可忽略,井眼流体为气时对电缆测井响应的影响大于随钻测井。

关 键 词:脉冲中子孔隙度  随钻测井  电缆测井  测井响应差异  数值模拟  

A Study on Pulsed-neutron Porosity Logging Response Difference in#br#Logging-while-drilling and Wireline
YUAN Chao,LIU Hanlin,ZHANG Feng,YUAN Yue,LIU Juntao. A Study on Pulsed-neutron Porosity Logging Response Difference in#br#Logging-while-drilling and Wireline[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Seience & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(2): 79. DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.01.13.08
Authors:YUAN Chao  LIU Hanlin  ZHANG Feng  YUAN Yue  LIU Juntao
Affiliation:1. Research Department of Well-logging and Remote Sensing Technology,RIPED,PetroChina,Haidian,Beijing 100083,China;2. School of Earth;Sciences and Engineering,Xi′ an Shiyou University,Xi′ an,Shaanxi 710065,China;3. School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum,;Qingdao,Shandong 266580,China;4. Shanghai Branch of CNOOC,Xuhui,Shanghai 200335,China
Abstract:Because the formation model and measurement condition are different,the pulsed-neutron porosity logging responseoflogging-while-drilling(LWD)is different from that of wireline(WL),so the study on the response difference canprovide theoretical basis for the logging interpretation of pulsed-neutron porosity logging while drilling. In this paper,MonteCarlo method is employed to build different models to study the response differences under different logging environments.The results show that the counting ratio under LWD conditions increases in three-order polynomial form with the increase ofporosity,and the WL neutron logging response displays the same changing trend,but there is a crossing point in the LWD andWL logging response curves. The relative sensitivity to porosity in LWD is greater than that in WL,but the drilling collar inLWD tool can reduce the counting statistics of thermal neutron,which may influence the measurement accuracy. The effectof different logging environments on the logging response of LWD and WL decreases with the increaseof porosity. The effectof lithology,shale content and borehole size on the logging response difference of LWD is larger than that of WL. When theborehole is filled with fresh water,oil and brine,the effect on logging response is slight and can be ignored. While the boreholeis full of gas,the effect on logging response of LWD is smaller than WL.
Keywords:pulsed-neutron porosity logging  logging while drilling  wireline logging  logging response difference  numerical
simulation
  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号