首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

国际植物新品种知识产权保护模式研究
引用本文:罗忠玲,邹彩芬,王雅鹏.国际植物新品种知识产权保护模式研究[J].科学管理研究,2006,24(1).
作者姓名:罗忠玲  邹彩芬  王雅鹏
作者单位:华中农业大学,经济贸易学院,湖北,武汉,430070
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(70473028)
摘    要:发达国家倾向于采取强化商业育种者利益的保护模式,特别是欧洲国家力推的以UPOV①公约为基础的专门方式(简称UPOV方式),并利用双边或多边协议,向发展中国家施加压力。发展中国家倾向于采取平衡育种者与相关利益主体权益的保护模式,建立适合自己国情的植物新品种保护制度,最具代表性的是印度和非洲统一组织的平衡型模式,但这种模式遭受到发达国家的阻拦。发达国家借TRIPS协议力推UPOV方式,尤其是保护水平更高的1991文本,这给我国等发展中国家带来了严峻挑战。

关 键 词:TRIPS协定  植物新品种  知识产权保护  UPOV

Analysis of the Plant Variety Protection Model under TRIPS--Different Solutions in Developed and Developing countries
Luo Zhongling,Zou Caifen,Wang yapeng.Analysis of the Plant Variety Protection Model under TRIPS--Different Solutions in Developed and Developing countries[J].Scientific Management Research,2006,24(1).
Authors:Luo Zhongling  Zou Caifen  Wang yapeng
Abstract:Developed nations prefer to adopt the model to strengthen the interests of commercial breeders.Especially,European nations commonly push UPOV style and put great pressure on developing countries through bilateral and multilateral agreements.Yet most developing countries intend to protect not only their breeders but also the interests of farmers and local communities.For example,PVP legislation adopted in India and OAU(the Organization of African Unity)is the typical model.Through implementation of TRIPS,developed countries preferably promote the UPOV system,especially the version of the 1991 Act with higher standard.China and other developing countries are thus meeting with great challenges in PVP legislation.
Keywords:TRIPS Agreement  new Varieties of Plants  intellectual property protection  UPOV
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号