古白驹场及施耐庵籍贯续考

王同书先生为《施耐庵研究论文集粹·大丰市学者论文专辑》所撰之序和他的系列三篇《施耐庵籍贯考证》、《白驹为施耐庵故里考议》、《施耐庵籍贯、故里三考》,牵强附会,舛错迭出,甚至以妄言惑人。本文据引史实辨析证明,元末明初白驹场行政上隶属于兴化管辖,并非隶属于泰州;张士诚的里籍为泰州草堰场,并非泰州白驹场;施耐庵为兴化白驹场人,并非泰州白驹场人。王同书等人观点是不准确的,特予辨析,以正视听。

A Further Discussion on the Ancient Baijuchang and the Native Place of the Water Margin Author Shi Naian

The preface written by Mr. Wang Tongshu for Dafeng City Research Papers Highlights, Academic Thesis Album of Shi Naian, and his three series articles： A Textual Research on Shi Naian＇s Native Place, A Textual Research and Discussion on Baiju is Shi Naian＇ s Hometowm, and The 3rd Textual Research on Shi Naian＇ s Native Place and Hometowm, are far -fetched, with many mistakes, even telling lies to mislead people. This paper, according to the analysis of historical facts, proves that, Baijuchang administrative subordinates to Xinghua jurisdiction at the end of the Yuan Dynasty and the beginning of Ming Dynasty, not belongs to the Taizhou; Zhang Shicheng＇ s native place is in Caoyanchang of Taizhou, not in Baijuchang of Taizhou ; Shi Naian lived in Baijuchang of Xinghua , not in Baijuchang of Taizhou. The views of Wang Tongshu and other people are not accurate ; we differentiate and analyze the truth in order to ensure a correct understanding of the facts.