首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

博文盆地M煤层气田含气量主控因素分析及预测
引用本文:马晓荷,谭成仟,郭泽坤.博文盆地M煤层气田含气量主控因素分析及预测[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(11):4586-4595.
作者姓名:马晓荷  谭成仟  郭泽坤
作者单位:西安石油大学;中国石油塔里木油田公司
基金项目:中国石油天然气股份有限公司科学研究与技术开发项目;油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室(西南石油大学)开放基金课题资助项目
摘    要:精准预测煤层含气量是煤层气资源量评价及开发方案制定的关键之一,传统预测方法应用范围有限且预测误差较大。为了进一步提高含气量预测精度,以博文盆地M煤层气田GM煤层为研究对象,基于皮尔逊相关分析法对含气量主控因素进行定量分析,优选出了9个煤层含气量影响主控因素,提出基于高斯过程回归、支持向量机及集成装袋树等机器学习算法的煤层含气量预测模型,对比分析各方法优缺点,进而优选出最佳的含气量预测模型。研究结果表明:高斯过程回归精确度最高,预测结果平均相对误差为4.5%,适用于本气田煤层气的含气量预测;支持向量机泛化能力强,但是超平面的绝对化导致预测精度降低;集成装袋树并不侧重于训练数据集中的任何特定实例,对于噪声数据其基本不受过分拟合的影响。

关 键 词:煤层含气量  机器学习  博文盆地M煤层气田  主控因素分析
收稿时间:2022/7/26 0:00:00
修稿时间:2023/4/13 0:00:00

Analysis and Prediction of Main Controlling Factors of Gas Content in Coalbed of M Coalfield in Bowen Basin
Ma Xiaohe,Tan Chengqian,Guo Zekun.Analysis and Prediction of Main Controlling Factors of Gas Content in Coalbed of M Coalfield in Bowen Basin[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2023,23(11):4586-4595.
Authors:Ma Xiaohe  Tan Chengqian  Guo Zekun
Institution:Xi''an Shiyou University
Abstract:Accurate prediction of coalbed gas content is one of the keys to the evaluation of coalbed gas resources and the determination of development plans. Traditional prediction methods have limited application scope and big prediction errors. In order to further improve the prediction accuracy of gas content, taking the GM coalbed of the M coalfield in Bowen basin as the research object, the main controlling factors of gas content were quantitatively analyzed based on the Pearson correlation analysis method, and nine main controlling factors affecting the gas content of coalbed were selected. The prediction model of coalbed gas content based on machine learning algorithms such as Gaussian Process Regression, Support Vector Machine and Ensemble Bagging Tree, etc., were proposed. After comparing and analyzing the advantages, disadvantages of each method, the best prediction model for gas content was selected. The research results show that the Gaussian Process Regression has the highest accuracy, and the average relative error of the prediction results is 4.5%, which is suitable for the gas content prediction of coalbed gas in M coalfield. The Support Vector Machine has strong generalization ability, but the absoluteization of the hyperplane reduces the prediction accuracy. The Ensemble Bagging Tree does not focus on any particular instance in the training dataset and is largely immune to overfitting on noisy data.
Keywords:coalbed gas content      machine learning      M coalfield in Bowen Basin      master control factor analysis
点击此处可从《科学技术与工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科学技术与工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号